Geographic access and the use of screening mammography
- PMID: 20195174
- PMCID: PMC3647348
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca3ecb
Geographic access and the use of screening mammography
Abstract
Background: Screening mammography rates vary geographically and have recently declined. Inadequate mammography resources in some areas may impair access to this technology. We assessed the relationship between availability of mammography machines and the use of screening.
Methods: The location and number of all mammography machines in the United States were identified from US Food and Drug Administration records of certified facilities. Inadequate capacity was defined as <1.2 mammography machines per 10,000 women age 40 or older, the threshold required to meet the Healthy People 2010 target screening rate. The impact of capacity on utilization was evaluated in 2 cohorts: female respondents age 40 or older to the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey (BRFSS) and a 5% nationwide sample of female Medicare beneficiaries age 65 or older in 2004-2005.
Results: About 9% of women in the BRFSS cohort and 13% of women in the Medicare cohort lived in counties with <1.2 mammography machines per 10,000 women age 40 or older. In both cohorts, residence in a county with inadequate mammography capacity was associated with lower odds of a recent mammogram (adjusted odds ratio in BRFSS: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98, P < 0.05; adjusted odds ratio in Medicare: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.85-0.87, P < 0.05), controlling for demographic and health care characteristics.
Conclusion: In counties with few or no mammography machines, limited availability of imaging resources may be a barrier to screening. Efforts to increase the number of machines in low-capacity areas may improve mammography rates and reduce geographic disparities in breast cancer screening.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Associations of County-level Radiologist and Mammography Facility Supply with Screening Mammography Rates in the United States.Acad Radiol. 2018 Jul;25(7):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.023. Epub 2018 Jan 17. Acad Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29373212
-
Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000-2010.Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3847-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28305. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23943323 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of US counties with no mammography capacity.J Community Health. 2012 Dec;37(6):1239-48. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9562-z. J Community Health. 2012. PMID: 22477670 Free PMC article.
-
Mammography capacity and appointment wait times: barriers to breast cancer screening.Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Jan;23(1):45-50. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9853-1. Epub 2011 Oct 29. Cancer Causes Control. 2012. PMID: 22037904 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Mammography and Breast Ultrasonography Services in Ghana, Availability, and Geographic Access.JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Aug;10:e2400218. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00218. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39208381
-
Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.J Public Health Res. 2024 Aug 5;13(3):22799036241268841. doi: 10.1177/22799036241268841. eCollection 2024 Jul. J Public Health Res. 2024. PMID: 39119619 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disparate access to breast cancer screening and treatment.BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01793-z. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35733197 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Breast Cancer Screening Practices by Diabetes Status and Race/Ethnicity in the United States.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jun;31(6):848-855. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0396. Epub 2021 Dec 17. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022. PMID: 34935471 Free PMC article.
-
Breast Cancer Disparities and the Impact of Geography.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022 Jan;31(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022. PMID: 34776066 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Freedman DA, Petitti DB, Robins JM. On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:43–55. - PubMed
-
- Kerlikowske K. Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;22:79–86. - PubMed
-
- Dodd GD. American Cancer Society guidelines from the past to the present. Cancer. 1993;72:1429–1432. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
-
- Miller JW, King JB, Ryerson AB, et al. Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: state-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:352–360. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
