The effect of superstructure design on stress distribution in peri-implant bone during mandibular flexure
- PMID: 20209184
The effect of superstructure design on stress distribution in peri-implant bone during mandibular flexure
Abstract
Purpose: Mandibular flexure may affect stress distribution in implant-supported fixed partial dentures; however, this factor has been overlooked in most finite element analyses of the mandible. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two different superstructures on stress distribution in mandibular bone during mandibular deformation caused by clenching.
Materials and methods: Three-dimensional finite element models consisting of the mandibular bone, six implants, and two- or three-piece superstructures were created. Muscle forces with definite direction and magnitude were exerted over areas of attachment to simulate two static bites of incisal and right molar clenching because, during these clenching tasks, a significant amount of mandibular deformation occurs. The stress analysis was performed using von Misses stress values.
Results: During right molar clenching, the two-piece superstructure showed increased stress values. During incisal clenching, the three-piece superstructure inhibited mandibular deformation more than the two-piece superstructure.
Conclusions: Mandibular deformation was an important factor in the stress distribution of the models, and it should be considered in the design of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in the mandible.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of 1-piece superstructure on mandibular flexure.Implant Dent. 2009 Oct;18(5):428-37. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181ad8d87. Implant Dent. 2009. PMID: 22129961
-
Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jul-Aug;20(4):578-83. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005. PMID: 16161742
-
The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):129-34. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100413. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 22945697
-
Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):421-38. Technol Health Care. 2006. PMID: 17065763 Review.
-
Mandibular flexure and its significance on implant fixed prostheses: a review.J Prosthodont. 2012 Apr;21(3):219-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00798.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1. J Prosthodont. 2012. PMID: 22044758 Review.
Cited by
-
Median mandibular flexure-the unique physiological phenomenon of the mandible and its clinical significance in implant restoration.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Sep 7;11:1238181. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1238181. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37744259 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retrospective digital study of mandibular flexure in patients with long-span fixed restorations supported by natural teeth.BMC Res Notes. 2023 Sep 11;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06486-w. BMC Res Notes. 2023. PMID: 37697386 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical Implications of Mandibular Flexion on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Systematic Literature Review.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):5302. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165302. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37629344 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Influence of Mandibular Flexure on Oral Rehabilitation: Narrative Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416748. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36554629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Aug 29;10:928656. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.928656. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36105608 Free PMC article.