Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer
- PMID: 20212180
- PMCID: PMC4251764
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.1
Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: The 2 primary therapeutic interventions for localized prostate cancer are delivered by different types of physicians, urologists, and radiation oncologists. We evaluated how visits to specialists and primary care physicians (PCPs) by men with localized prostate cancer are related to treatment choice.
Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, we identified 85 088 men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed at age 65 years or older, between 1994 and 2002. Men were categorized by primary treatment received within 9 months of diagnosis: radical prostatectomy (n = 18 201 [21%]), radiotherapy (n = 35 925 [42%]), androgen deprivation (n = 14 021 [17%]), or expectant management (n = 16 941 [20%]). Visits to specialists and PCPs were analyzed by patient characteristics and primary therapies received and were identified using Medicare claims and the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile.
Results: Overall, 42 309 men (50%) were seen exclusively by urologists, 37 540 (44%) by urologists and radiation oncologists, 2329 (3%) by urologists and medical oncologists, and 2910 (3%) by all 3 specialists. There was a strong association between the type of specialist seen and primary therapy received. Visits to PCPs were infrequent between diagnosis and receipt of therapy (22% of patients visited any PCP and 17% visited an established PCP) and were not associated with a greater likelihood of specialist visits. Irrespective of age, comorbidity status, or specialist visits, men seen by PCPs were more likely to be treated expectantly.
Conclusions: Specialist visits relate strongly to prostate cancer treatment choices. In light of these findings, prior evidence that specialists prefer the modality they themselves deliver and the lack of conclusive comparative studies demonstrating superiority of one modality over another, it is essential to ensure that men have access to balanced information before choosing a particular therapy for prostate cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.
Figures
Comment in
-
Patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: essential for high-quality care.Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):403-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.5. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20212173 No abstract available.
-
The prostate cancer treatment bazaar: comment on "Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer".Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):450-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.2. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20212181 No abstract available.
-
Specialist visits (urologist, radiation oncologist, medical oncologist) are strongly associated with treatment received for prostate cancer in the USA.Evid Based Med. 2010 Jun;15(3):95-6. doi: 10.1136/ebm1074. Evid Based Med. 2010. PMID: 20522696 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.JAMA. 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3217-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.24.3217. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 10866869
-
United States radiation oncologists' and urologists' opinions about screening and treatment of prostate cancer vary by region.Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4):628-33. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01832-0. Urology. 2002. PMID: 12385923
-
The prostate cancer treatment bazaar: comment on "Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer".Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):450-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.2. Arch Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20212181 No abstract available.
-
Physician variation in management of low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Sep;174(9):1450-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3021. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25023650 Free PMC article.
-
The role of androgen ablation in patients with biochemical or local failure after definitive radiation therapy: a survey of practice patterns of urologists and radiation oncologists in the United States.Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 Suppl 1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01244-4. Urology. 2001. PMID: 11502452 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of Oncology and Radiation Therapy Representation on the National Board of Medical Examiners Official Practice Material for the United States National Standardized Medical Board Examinations.J Cancer Educ. 2024 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02475-0. Online ahead of print. J Cancer Educ. 2024. PMID: 38997529
-
A Comparison Between the Rates of Radiation Oncologist and Urologist Consultations in Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer in Northern Ontario, Canada.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 28;8(2):101131. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101131. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36845619 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):600-608. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002734. Epub 2022 May 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35522191 Free PMC article.
-
Regional Variation in Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031349. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31349. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33369661 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with physicians' recommendations for managing low-risk papillary thyroid cancer.Am J Surg. 2021 Jul;222(1):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 12. Am J Surg. 2021. PMID: 33248684 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 [epub ahead of print] - PubMed
-
- Zeliadt SB, Ramsey SD, Penson DF, et al. Why do men choose one treatment over another?: a review of patient decision making for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2006;106(9):1865–1874. - PubMed
-
- D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Jama. 1998;280(11):969–974. - PubMed
-
- Moore MJ, O'Sullivan B, Tannock IF. How expert physicians would wish to be treated if they had genitourinary cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6(11):1736–1745. - PubMed
-
- Fowler FJ, Jr, McNaughton Collins M, Albertsen PC, Zietman A, Elliott DB, Barry MJ. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Jama. 2000;283(24):3217–3222. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
