Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;16(3):182-9.

Adoption and use of stand-alone electronic prescribing in a health plan-sponsored initiative

Affiliations

Adoption and use of stand-alone electronic prescribing in a health plan-sponsored initiative

Joshua M Pevnick et al. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify rates of stand-alone e-prescribing (SEP) adoption and use among primary care physicians (PCPs) participating in a SEP initiative and to determine which physician and patient characteristics were associated with higher rates of each.

Study design: Using records from an insurer-led SEP initiative, we compared the characteristics of 297 PCPs who adopted SEP through the initiative with the characteristics of 1892 eligible PCPs who did not. Among 297 adopters, we studied the extent of SEP use.

Methods: Dependent variables included each physician's adoption of SEP and his or her e-prescribing use ratio (the ratio of electronic prescriptions to pharmacy claims in the same period). Independent variables included characteristics of PCPs (specialty, practice size, and prescribing volume) and their patients (patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and household income).

Results: Solo practitioners, pediatricians, and physicians with more patients from predominantly African American zip codes were underrepresented among SEP adopters. The mean (SD) e-prescribing use ratio among adopters was 0.23 (0.28). Twenty percent of physicians maintained e-prescribing use ratios above 0.50. Available physician characteristics explained little of the variance in use, but physicians in smaller practices had greater use (P = .02).

Conclusions: Certain categories of physicians may need more tailored incentives to adopt SEP. On average, adopters used the SEP system for only about one-quarter of their prescriptions. Some adopters achieved high levels of SEP use, and further research is needed to elucidate the factors that enabled this.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Selection of PCPs for Adoption Analysis
*These two groups are compared in the adoption analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of E-Prescribing Use Among Adopting Physicians (n = 297) During the Usage Evaluation Period (1/1/06 – 6/30/06)*
*By dividing the number of electronic prescriptions written for Horizon BCBSNJ patients during the e-prescribing usage evaluation period (1/1/06 – 6/30/06) by the number of Horizon BCBSNJ pharmacy claims processed during the e-prescribing usage evaluation period, an ‘e-prescribing usage ratio’ ranging from 0–1 is calculated for each physician.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 11; 0000605-200605160-200600125. - PubMed
    1. Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the Transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the Quality of Care. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2218–2227. - PubMed
    1. Bohmer R, Edmondson A, Feldman L. Harvard Business School Case: Intermountain Health Care. 2002
    1. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311–1316. - PubMed
    1. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou X-H, McDonald CJ. A Randomized Trial of “Corollary Orders” to Prevent Errors of Omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Sep 1;4(5):364–375. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types