Adoption and use of stand-alone electronic prescribing in a health plan-sponsored initiative
- PMID: 20225913
- PMCID: PMC4811600
Adoption and use of stand-alone electronic prescribing in a health plan-sponsored initiative
Abstract
Objectives: To quantify rates of stand-alone e-prescribing (SEP) adoption and use among primary care physicians (PCPs) participating in a SEP initiative and to determine which physician and patient characteristics were associated with higher rates of each.
Study design: Using records from an insurer-led SEP initiative, we compared the characteristics of 297 PCPs who adopted SEP through the initiative with the characteristics of 1892 eligible PCPs who did not. Among 297 adopters, we studied the extent of SEP use.
Methods: Dependent variables included each physician's adoption of SEP and his or her e-prescribing use ratio (the ratio of electronic prescriptions to pharmacy claims in the same period). Independent variables included characteristics of PCPs (specialty, practice size, and prescribing volume) and their patients (patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and household income).
Results: Solo practitioners, pediatricians, and physicians with more patients from predominantly African American zip codes were underrepresented among SEP adopters. The mean (SD) e-prescribing use ratio among adopters was 0.23 (0.28). Twenty percent of physicians maintained e-prescribing use ratios above 0.50. Available physician characteristics explained little of the variance in use, but physicians in smaller practices had greater use (P = .02).
Conclusions: Certain categories of physicians may need more tailored incentives to adopt SEP. On average, adopters used the SEP system for only about one-quarter of their prescriptions. Some adopters achieved high levels of SEP use, and further research is needed to elucidate the factors that enabled this.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Uptake of electronic prescribing in community-based practices.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):358-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0383-1. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18373130 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in electronic prescribing implementation among twelve ambulatory practices.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):364-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0494-8. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18373131 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices.J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1238-8. Epub 2010 Feb 26. J Gen Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20186499 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines: a systematic literature review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 20;14:469. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-469. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25331607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital Health in Physicians' and Pharmacists' Office: A Comparative Study of e-Prescription Systems' Architecture and Digital Security in Eight Countries.OMICS. 2021 Feb;25(2):102-122. doi: 10.1089/omi.2020.0085. Epub 2020 Sep 15. OMICS. 2021. PMID: 32931378 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prescription Precision: A Comprehensive Review of Intelligent Prescription Systems.Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(34):2671-2684. doi: 10.2174/0113816128321623240719104337. Curr Pharm Des. 2024. PMID: 39092640 Review.
-
Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x. Implement Sci. 2024. PMID: 38347525 Free PMC article. Review.
-
eHealth in the future of medications management: personalisation, monitoring and adherence.BMC Med. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0838-0. BMC Med. 2017. PMID: 28376771 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Aug 1;9:335-44. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S103881. eCollection 2016. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016. PMID: 27536128 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of electronic prescribing with formulary decision support on medication tier, copayments, and adherence.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Aug 28;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-79. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014. PMID: 25167807 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 11; 0000605-200605160-200600125. - PubMed
-
- Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the Transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the Quality of Care. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2218–2227. - PubMed
-
- Bohmer R, Edmondson A, Feldman L. Harvard Business School Case: Intermountain Health Care. 2002
-
- Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1311–1316. - PubMed