Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
- PMID: 20228401
- PMCID: PMC4123215
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286
Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background: There is no evidence from randomized trials to support a strategy of lowering systolic blood pressure below 135 to 140 mm Hg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We investigated whether therapy targeting normal systolic pressure (i.e., <120 mm Hg) reduces major cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events.
Methods: A total of 4733 participants with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to intensive therapy, targeting a systolic pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, or standard therapy, targeting a systolic pressure of less than 140 mm Hg. The primary composite outcome was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. The mean follow-up was 4.7 years.
Results: After 1 year, the mean systolic blood pressure was 119.3 mm Hg in the intensive-therapy group and 133.5 mm Hg in the standard-therapy group. The annual rate of the primary outcome was 1.87% in the intensive-therapy group and 2.09% in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio with intensive therapy, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.06; P=0.20). The annual rates of death from any cause were 1.28% and 1.19% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.35; P=0.55). The annual rates of stroke, a prespecified secondary outcome, were 0.32% and 0.53% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P=0.01). Serious adverse events attributed to antihypertensive treatment occurred in 77 of the 2362 participants in the intensive-therapy group (3.3%) and 30 of the 2371 participants in the standard-therapy group (1.3%) (P<0.001).
Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with less than 140 mm Hg, did not reduce the rate of a composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000620.)
2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Figures
Comment in
-
ACCORD and Risk-Factor Control in Type 2 Diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1628-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1002498. Epub 2010 Mar 14. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20228405 No abstract available.
-
Therapeutics. Intensive blood pressure control did not prevent major CV events more than standard control in type 2 diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):JC1-4, JC1-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-02004. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20643982 No abstract available.
-
Intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure to a target of less than 120 mm Hg has no effect on the rate of fatal and non-fatal major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.Evid Based Med. 2010 Oct;15(5):142-3. doi: 10.1136/ebm1099. Epub 2010 Jul 28. Evid Based Med. 2010. PMID: 20667901 No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):695; author reply 697. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1006411. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20701534 No abstract available.
-
Optimal blood pressure for a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insight from the ACCORD study.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010 Oct;12(5):313-5. doi: 10.1007/s11906-010-0145-z. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010. PMID: 20725808 No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):695-6; author reply 697. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1006411. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20842774 No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):696; author reply 697. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1006411. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20842775 No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Dec;56(6):1029-31. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 25. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010. PMID: 20870328 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Discord from ACCORD?Curr Hypertens Rep. 2011 Feb;13(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s11906-010-0159-6. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2011. PMID: 20963517 No abstract available.
-
[Cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. ACCORD study (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes)].Internist (Berl). 2011 May;52(5):601-4. doi: 10.1007/s00108-011-2843-2. Internist (Berl). 2011. PMID: 21455685 German. No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure targets in patients with diabetes--a new perspective.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 May;9(5):334-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 16. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015. PMID: 25979409 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[The SPRINT Research. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control].Vnitr Lek. 2016 Jan;62(1):44-7. Vnitr Lek. 2016. PMID: 26967236 Clinical Trial. Czech.
-
Evaluation of Optimal Diastolic Blood Pressure Range Among Adults With Treated Systolic Blood Pressure Less Than 130 mm Hg.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37554. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33595663 Free PMC article.
-
Lowering systolic blood pressure to less than 120 mm Hg versus less than 140 mm Hg in patients with high cardiovascular risk with and without diabetes or previous stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised trial.Lancet. 2024 Jul 20;404(10449):245-255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01028-6. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Lancet. 2024. PMID: 38945140 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):435-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3. Epub 2015 Nov 7. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26559744 Review.
-
Intensive Blood Pressure Targets for Diabetic and Other High-Risk Populations: A Pooled Individual Patient Data Analysis.Hypertension. 2018 May;71(5):833-839. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10713. Epub 2018 Mar 12. Hypertension. 2018. PMID: 29531175 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment optimisation for blood pressure with single-pill combinations in India (TOPSPIN) - Protocol design and baseline characteristics.Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024 Oct 24;23:200346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200346. eCollection 2024 Dec. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024. PMID: 39554875 Free PMC article.
-
Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Contemporary Evidence.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Aug 13;3(10):102234. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102234. eCollection 2024 Oct. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024. PMID: 39525984 Free PMC article.
-
Elucidating the complex interplay between chronic kidney disease and hypertension.Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct 16. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01937-8. Online ahead of print. Hypertens Res. 2024. PMID: 39415028 Review.
-
Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with chronic renal disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 15;10(10):CD008564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008564.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39403990 Review.
-
Association between body fat variation rate and risk of diabetic nephropathy - a posthoc analysis based on ACCORD database.BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2805. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20317-y. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39396960 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12 yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:434–44. - PubMed
-
- Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–2572. - PubMed
- Erratum, JAMA. 2003;290:197.
-
- Cushman W, Grimm RH, Jr, Cutler JA, et al. Rationale and design for the blood pressure intervention of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(Suppl):44i–55i. - PubMed
-
- ACCORD Study Group. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial: design and methods. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(Suppl):21i–33i. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
- N01HC95183/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- Y1-HC-9035/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- Y01 HC001010/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01HC95178/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95180/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- Y1-HC-1010/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95183/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95178/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01HC95182/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95179/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95181/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01HC95179/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95184/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL073030/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01HC95180/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01HC95181/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01HC95184/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-HC-95182/HC/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical