Implementing successful quality outcome programs in ambulatory care: key questions and recommendations
- PMID: 20228634
- DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181d9165f
Implementing successful quality outcome programs in ambulatory care: key questions and recommendations
Abstract
With recent increasing attention to rising healthcare costs, both public and private sectors are demanding more value from the services and products they purchase. To achieve this goal, programs such as pay-for-performance have been implemented with varying success. One of the reasons behind the failures is the lack of understanding of how standards are received and accepted in the provider community. The purpose of this article is to outline some steps that will facilitate standard development and monitoring, with the aim of improving the actual outcomes themselves.
Similar articles
-
Building blocks to adopting a pay-for-performance model.JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2008 Jul-Sep;10(3):64-9; quiz 70-1. doi: 10.1097/01.NHL.0000300794.20509.73. JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2008. PMID: 18776745 Review.
-
Pay-for-performance as a method to establish the business case for quality.J Health Care Finance. 2007 Summer;33(4):17-30. J Health Care Finance. 2007. PMID: 19172960
-
Pay for performance in neonatal-perinatal medicine--will the quality of health care improve in the neonatal intensive care unit? A business model for improving outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit.Clin Perinatol. 2010 Mar;37(1):167-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.01.010. Clin Perinatol. 2010. PMID: 20363453
-
Practical issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs.J Healthc Manag. 2007 Jan-Feb;52(1):10-8; discussion 18-9. J Healthc Manag. 2007. PMID: 17288114
-
Pay for performance in emergency medicine.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):756-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.032. Epub 2006 Sep 15. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 16979264 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
