What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening?
- PMID: 20309740
- PMCID: PMC2881957
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1318-9
What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening?
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be administered through tests with varied characteristics and is a preference-sensitive decision.
Objective: To assess patient experiences with a Maximum Differences Scaling (MDS) tool for eliciting values about CRC screening test characteristics and determine whether patients vary in how they prioritize test characteristics and whether this variation relates to test preferences.
Design: MDS survey to elicit patients' values for characteristics related to fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography and colon capsule endoscopy.
Participants: 92 patients enrolled in primary care clinics at a VA hospital and associated university.
Results: Patients reported that the tool was easy to use (95%). On completion 62% would choose colonoscopy, 23% colon capsule endoscopy and 10% CT colonography. Of the attributes evaluated, patients valued sensitivity, risk of tear and need for a second test most. Sensitivity was more important to those choosing colonoscopy than those choosing other tests (median importance = 21.5 versus 19.6, p < 0.01). Concern with complications and sedation was positively associated with age (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), whereas concern with colon preparation and missing work was negatively associated with age (p < 0.009 and p < 0.03). Patients with fair or poor health status were less concerned with sensitivity than patients in good to excellent health (median importance = 19.3 versus 21.4, p < 0.008).
Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that patients vary in how they prioritize colorectal cancer screening test attributes; this variation is associated with test preferences, and this MDS tool is feasible to use and may help patients construct their preferences.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0051-z. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013. PMID: 23979875
-
Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):638-58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245. Epub 2008 Oct 6. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18838718 Review.
-
Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: impact of endoscopy nurses.World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 21;18(27):3590-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22826625 Free PMC article.
-
Potential screening benefit of a colorectal imaging capsule that does not require bowel preparation.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;48(1):52-4. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318288a2cd. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 23632347
-
Update on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Computed Tomographic Colonography, and Capsule Colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):569-583. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Apr 15. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020. PMID: 32439089 Review.
Cited by
-
Eliciting vulnerable patients' preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Oct 31;12:2267-2282. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S156552. eCollection 2018. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018. PMID: 30464417 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individualized Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Older Adults and Their Primary Care Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.MDM Policy Pract. 2018 May 2;3(1):2381468318765172. doi: 10.1177/2381468318765172. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2018. PMID: 30288441 Free PMC article.
-
Individual Value Clarification Methods Based on Conjoint Analysis: A Systematic Review of Common Practice in Task Design, Statistical Analysis, and Presentation of Results.Med Decis Making. 2018 Aug;38(6):746-755. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18765185. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Med Decis Making. 2018. PMID: 29592585 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences among Black and Latino Primary Care Patients.J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Oct;19(5):1100-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0453-8. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017. PMID: 27351895 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Health Econ Rev. 2016. PMID: 26743636 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1983.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
