Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;7(5):516-24.
doi: 10.1177/1740774510366454. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

Clinical Trials for Predictive Medicine: New Challenges and Paradigms

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Clinical Trials for Predictive Medicine: New Challenges and Paradigms

Richard Simon. Clin Trials. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Developments in biotechnology and genomics have increased the focus of biostatisticians on prediction problems. This has led to many exciting developments for predictive modeling where the number of variables is larger than the number of cases. Heterogeneity of human diseases and new technology for characterizing them presents new opportunities and challenges for the design and analysis of clinical trials.

Purpose: In oncology, treatment of broad populations with regimens that do not benefit most patients is less economically sustainable with expensive molecularly targeted therapeutics. The established molecular heterogeneity of human diseases requires the development of new paradigms for the design and analysis of randomized clinical trials as a reliable basis for predictive medicine [Simon R. An agenda for clinical trials: clinical trials in the genomic era. Clin Trials 2004; 1:468-70, Simon R. New challenges for 21st century clinical trials. Clin Trials 2007; 4: 167-9.].

Results: We have reviewed prospective designs for the development of new therapeutics with candidate predictive biomarkers. We have also outlined a prediction based approach to the analysis of randomized clinical trials that both preserves the type I error and provides a reliable internally validated basis for predicting which patients are most likely or unlikely to benefit from the new regimen.

Conclusions: Developing new treatments with predictive biomarkers for identifying the patients who are most likely or least likely to benefit makes drug development more complex. But for many new oncology drugs it is the only science based approach and should increase the chance of success. It may also lead to more consistency in results among trials and has obvious benefits for reducing the number of patients who ultimately receive expensive drugs which expose them risks of adverse events but no benefit. This approach also has great potential value for controlling societal expenditures on health care. Development of treatments with predictive biomarkers requires major changes in the standard paradigms for the design and analysis of clinical trials. Some of the key assumptions upon which current methods are based are no longer valid. In addition to reviewing a variety of new clinical trial designs for co-development of treatments and predictive biomarkers, we have outlined a prediction based approach to the analysis of randomized clinical trials. This is a very structured approach whose use requires careful prospective planning. It requires further development but may serve as a basis for a new generation of predictive clinical trials which provide the kinds of reliable individualized information which physicians and patients have long sought, but which have not been available from the past use of post-hoc subset analysis.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Targeted Design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Biomarker Stratified Design

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 16 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Substances

Feedback