Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed?
- PMID: 20347744
- PMCID: PMC2851222
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.018
Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed?
Abstract
Background: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) will soon be reporting procedure-specific outcomes, and hopes to reduce the burden of data collection by collecting fewer variables. We sought to determine whether these changes threaten the robustness of the risk adjustment of hospital quality comparisons.
Study design: We used prospective, clinical data from the ACS NSQIP from 2005 to 2007 (184 hospitals, 74,887 patients). For the 5 general surgery operations in the procedure-specific NSQIP, we compared the ability of the full model (21 variables), an intermediate model (12 variables), and a limited model (5 variables) to predict patient outcomes and to risk-adjust hospital outcomes.
Results: The intermediate and limited models were comparable with the full model in all analyses. In the assessment of patient risk, the limited and full models had very similar discrimination at the patient level (C-indices for all 5 procedures combined of 0.93 versus 0.91 for mortality and 0.78 versus 0.76 for morbidity) and showed good calibration across strata of patient risk. In assessing hospital-specific outcomes, results from the limited and full-risk models were highly correlated for both mortality (range 0.94 to 0.99 across the 5 operations) and morbidity (range 0.96 to 0.99).
Conclusions: Procedure-specific hospital quality measures can be adequately risk-adjusted with a limited number of variables. In the context of the ACS NSQIP, moving to a more limited model will dramatically reduce the burden of data collection for participating hospitals.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Comment in
-
Risk-adjusted outcomes database as a tool to promote horizontal integration of surgical systems in low- and middle-income countries.J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Aug;211(2):296-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.016. J Am Coll Surg. 2010. PMID: 20670876 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating parsimonious risk-adjustment models for comparing hospital outcomes with vascular surgery.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;52(2):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.293. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20670776
-
Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):363-76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b4148f. Ann Surg. 2009. PMID: 19644350
-
The role of Surgical Champions in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--a national survey.J Surg Res. 2011 Mar;166(1):e15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.036. Epub 2010 Nov 25. J Surg Res. 2011. PMID: 21176914
-
Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.Adv Surg. 2010;44:251-67. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.003. Adv Surg. 2010. PMID: 20919525 Review.
-
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jul;23(7):589-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002223. Epub 2014 Apr 19. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014. PMID: 24748371 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in End-of-Life Care and Satisfaction Among Veterans Undergoing Surgery.Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 23:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006253. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006253. Online ahead of print. Ann Surg. 2024. PMID: 38390769
-
Expanding the Role of the Surgical Preoperative Evaluation Clinic: Impact on Risk and Quality Outcome Measures.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Sep 29;7(5):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.006. eCollection 2023 Oct. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 37818140 Free PMC article.
-
Index hospital cost of adverse events following thoracic surgery: a systematic review of economic literature.BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 28;13(9):e069382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069382. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37770272 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation and Assessment of No Opioid Prescription Strategy at Discharge After Major Urologic Cancer Surgery.JAMA Surg. 2023 Apr 1;158(4):378-385. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7652. JAMA Surg. 2023. PMID: 36753170 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Rescue in a High-volume Urban Emergency General Surgery Service at a Middle-income Country.Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg. 2021 Jan-Apr;10(1):16-19. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1305. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg. 2021. PMID: 36196079 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:777–782. - PubMed
-
- Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491–507. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:347–351. - PubMed
-
- Tu JV, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1317–1323. - PubMed
-
- ACS NSQIP. Data Collection Overview. Available from: https://acsnsqip.org/main/program_data_collection.asp.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
