Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;210(4):503-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.018.

Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed?

Justin B Dimick et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) will soon be reporting procedure-specific outcomes, and hopes to reduce the burden of data collection by collecting fewer variables. We sought to determine whether these changes threaten the robustness of the risk adjustment of hospital quality comparisons.

Study design: We used prospective, clinical data from the ACS NSQIP from 2005 to 2007 (184 hospitals, 74,887 patients). For the 5 general surgery operations in the procedure-specific NSQIP, we compared the ability of the full model (21 variables), an intermediate model (12 variables), and a limited model (5 variables) to predict patient outcomes and to risk-adjust hospital outcomes.

Results: The intermediate and limited models were comparable with the full model in all analyses. In the assessment of patient risk, the limited and full models had very similar discrimination at the patient level (C-indices for all 5 procedures combined of 0.93 versus 0.91 for mortality and 0.78 versus 0.76 for morbidity) and showed good calibration across strata of patient risk. In assessing hospital-specific outcomes, results from the limited and full-risk models were highly correlated for both mortality (range 0.94 to 0.99 across the 5 operations) and morbidity (range 0.96 to 0.99).

Conclusions: Procedure-specific hospital quality measures can be adequately risk-adjusted with a limited number of variables. In the context of the ACS NSQIP, moving to a more limited model will dramatically reduce the burden of data collection for participating hospitals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison ofhospital ratio of observed to expe cted outcomes (O/E) ratios created using the intermediate versus full model for (A) mortality and (B) morbidity for all 5 procedures combined.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison ofhospital observed to ex pected outcomes (O/E) ratios created using the limited versus full model for (A) mortality and (B) morbidity for all 5 procedures combined.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:777–782. - PubMed
    1. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491–507. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:347–351. - PubMed
    1. Tu JV, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1317–1323. - PubMed
    1. ACS NSQIP. Data Collection Overview. Available from: https://acsnsqip.org/main/program_data_collection.asp.

Publication types

MeSH terms