Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;22(3):179-86.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq014. Epub 2010 Mar 27.

A model for medication safety event detection

Affiliations

A model for medication safety event detection

Rita A Snyder et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Hospital medication safety event detection predominantly emphasizes the identification of preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) through self-reports. These relatively rare events only provide insight into patient harm and self-reports identify only a small portion of ADEs. A broader system-focused approach to medication safety event detection that uses an array of event detection methods is recommended. This approach illuminates medication system deficits and supports improvement strategies that can prevent future patient risk.

Objective: To: (i) describe a system-focused approach to hospital medication safety event detection, and (ii) present a case illustration of approach application. SYSTEM-FOCUSED MODEL AND METHODOLOGY: A three-level medication safety event detection model that ranges from a narrow harm-focused to broader system-focused approach is described. A standardized cross-level methodology to detect medication safety events is presented.

Case illustration: A Level 3 system-focused methodology that incorporated both voluntary and non-voluntary event detection strategies was used in 17 critical care (n = 4), intermediate care (n = 7) and medical-surgical units (n = 6) across two hospitals. A total of 431 events were detected: 78 (18.1%) ADEs and 353 (81.9%) potential ADEs. Of the 353 PADEs, 302 (70.0%) were non-intercepted events. Non-voluntary detection methods yielded the majority of events (367, 85.1%).

Conclusions: The incidence of ADEs was low when compared with non-intercepted PADEs. This was indicative of medication safety system failures that placed patients at risk for potential harm. Non-voluntary detection methods were much more effective at detecting events than traditional self-report methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Medication safety event (MSE) detection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Medication safety event detection and classification algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
    1. Stelfox HT, Palmisani S, Scurlock C, et al. The ‘To Err is Human’ report and the patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:174–8. doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.017947. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Classen DC, Metzger J. Improving medication safety: the measurement conundrum and where to start. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:i41–i47. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg083. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Cullen D, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34. doi:10.1001/jama.274.1.29. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results from the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms