Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 May;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S126-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1211-6.

Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program

Eboni G Price-Haywood et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May.

Abstract

Background: Low health literacy (HL) is an important risk factor for cancer health disparities.

Objective: Describe a continuing medical education (CME) program to teach primary care physicians (PCP) cancer risk communication and shared decision-making (SDM) with low HL patients and baseline skills assessment.

Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial in five primary care clinics in New Orleans, LA.

Participants: Eighteen PCPs and 73 low HL patients overdue for cancer screening.

Intervention: Primary care physicians completed unannounced standardized patient (SP) encounters at baseline. Intervention physicians received SP verbal feedback; academic detailing to review cancer screening guidelines, red flags for identifying low HL, and strategies for effective counseling; and web-based tutorial of SP comments and checklist items hyperlinked to reference articles/websites.

Main measures: Baseline PCP self-rated proficiency, SP ratings of physician general cancer risk communication and SDM skills, patient perceived involvement in care.

Results: Baseline assessments show physicians rated their proficiency in discussing cancer risks and eliciting patient preference for treatment/decision-making as "very good". SPs rated physician exploration of perceived cancer susceptibility, screening barriers/motivators, checking understanding, explaining screening options and associated risks/benefits, and eliciting preferences for screening as "satisfactory". Clinic patients rated their doctor's facilitation of involvement in care and information exchange as "good". However, they rated their participation in decision-making as "poor".

Discussion: The baseline skills assessment suggests a need for physician training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making for patients with low HL. We are determining the effectiveness of teaching methods, required resources and long-term feasibility for a CME program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Selden C, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, compilers. Current Bibliographies in Medicine: Health literacy. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 2000. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/cbm/hliteracy.html Accessed November 1, 2009.
    1. DeWalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone M. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–1239. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134–149. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.3.134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz MG, Jacobson TA, Veledar E, Kripalani S. Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:782–786. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0184-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types