Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;40(3):619-30.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9621-4. Epub 2010 Apr 3.

The relationship among sexual attitudes, sexual fantasy, and religiosity

Affiliations
Free PMC article

The relationship among sexual attitudes, sexual fantasy, and religiosity

Tierney K Ahrold et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Jun.
Free PMC article

Erratum in

  • Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Aug;40(4):851

Abstract

Recent research on the impact of religiosity on sexuality has highlighted the role of the individual, and suggests that the effects of religious group and sexual attitudes and fantasy may be mediated through individual differences in spirituality. The present study investigated the role of religion in an ethnically diverse young adult sample (N = 1413, 69% women) using religious group as well as several religiosity domains: spirituality, intrinsic religiosity, paranormal beliefs, and fundamentalism. Differences between religious groups in conservative sexual attitudes were statistically significant but small; as predicted, spirituality mediated these effects. In contrast to the weak effects of religious group, spirituality, intrinsic religiosity, and fundamentalism were strong predictors of women's conservative sexual attitudes; for men, intrinsic religiosity predicted sexual attitude conservatism but spirituality predicted attitudinal liberalism. For women, both religious group and religiosity domains were significant predictors of frequency of sexual fantasies while, for men, only religiosity domains were significant predictors. These results indicate that individual differences in religiosity domains were better predictors of sexual attitudes and fantasy than religious group and that these associations are moderated by gender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahrold TK, Meston CM. Ethnic differences in sexual attitudes of U.S. college students: Gender, acculturation, and religiosity factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2010;39:190–202. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allport GW, Ross MJ. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967;5:432–443. - PubMed
    1. Altemeyer B, Hunsberger B. Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 1992;2:113–133.
    1. Altemeyer B, Hunsberger B. A revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2004;14:47–54.
    1. Bainbridge WS. After the new age. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2004;43:381–394.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources