Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults
- PMID: 20371784
- PMCID: PMC2885954
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.338
Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults
Abstract
Context: In recent decades, the fastest growth in lumbar surgery occurred in older patients with spinal stenosis. Trials indicate that for selected patients, decompressive surgery offers an advantage over nonoperative treatment, but surgeons often recommend more invasive fusion procedures. Comorbidity is common in older patients, so benefits and risks must be carefully weighed in the choice of surgical procedure.
Objective: To examine trends in use of different types of stenosis operations and the association of complications and resource use with surgical complexity.
Design, setting, and patients: Retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare claims for 2002-2007, focusing on 2007 to assess complications and resource use in US hospitals. Operations for Medicare recipients undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis (n = 32,152 in the first 11 months of 2007) were grouped into 3 gradations of invasiveness: decompression alone, simple fusion (1 or 2 disk levels, single surgical approach), or complex fusion (more than 2 disk levels or combined anterior and posterior approach).
Main outcome measures: Rates of the 3 types of surgery, major complications, postoperative mortality, and resource use.
Results: Overall, surgical rates declined slightly from 2002-2007, but the rate of complex fusion procedures increased 15-fold, from 1.3 to 19.9 per 100,000 beneficiaries. Life-threatening complications increased with increasing surgical invasiveness, from 2.3% among patients having decompression alone to 5.6% among those having complex fusions. After adjustment for age, comorbidity, previous spine surgery, and other features, the odds ratio (OR) of life-threatening complications for complex fusion compared with decompression alone was 2.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50-3.49). A similar pattern was observed for rehospitalization within 30 days, which occurred for 7.8% of patients undergoing decompression and 13.0% having a complex fusion (adjusted OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.74-2.17). Adjusted mean hospital charges for complex fusion procedures were US $80,888 compared with US $23,724 for decompression alone.
Conclusions: Among Medicare recipients, between 2002 and 2007, the frequency of complex fusion procedures for spinal stenosis increased while the frequency of decompression surgery and simple fusions decreased. In 2007, compared with decompression, simple fusion and complex fusion were associated with increased risk of major complications, 30-day mortality, and resource use.
Figures
Comment in
-
The increasing morbidity of elective spinal stenosis surgery: is it necessary?JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1309-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.402. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20371793 No abstract available.
-
Evidence-based recommendations for spine surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):E897-903. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821c06d8. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 21642806 No abstract available.
-
Error in trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1088. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1300. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21917578 No abstract available.
-
Re: Interspinous spacers versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine 2013;38:1525.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1525. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182972e08. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23900116 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In response.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1526. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829c2e3a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23900117 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Trends, Complications, and Costs for Hospital Admission and Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Nov 15;42(22):1737-1743. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002207. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 28441309
-
Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion surgery for older adults with lumbar stenosis: trends, complications, repeat surgery, and charges.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):222-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821bfa3a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 21494195 Free PMC article.
-
Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):1979-86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01292. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011. PMID: 22048092 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 May;137(5):637-650. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2685-z. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017. PMID: 28361467 Review.
-
Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilisation compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.056. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Int J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28254421 Review.
Cited by
-
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Hypertrophy of Ligamentum Flavum.Biomolecules. 2024 Oct 10;14(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/biom14101277. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39456209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of cannabis use history on postoperative opioid utilization in lumbar fusion patients: an American retrospective study.Asian Spine J. 2024 Oct;18(5):639-646. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0194. Epub 2024 Oct 22. Asian Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39434224 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced recovery after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery care pathway: Perioperative strategy to improve outcome.Brain Spine. 2024 Aug 31;4:103326. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103326. eCollection 2024. Brain Spine. 2024. PMID: 39381755 Free PMC article.
-
Cerebrovascular pulsatility indicates preoperative subcortical cognitive impairment and an increased risk for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective spine surgery.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 24;11:1433380. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1433380. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39380730 Free PMC article.
-
The 3-Steps Approach for Lumbar Stenosis with Anatomical Insights, Tailored for Young Spine Surgeons.J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):985. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090985. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39338239 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, et al. Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine. Spine. 2005;30:2208–2213. - PubMed
-
- Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine. 1997;22:1123–1131. - PubMed
-
- Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessbert P, Nordwall A and the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment of chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine. 2001;26:2521–2532. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
