Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?
- PMID: 20381895
- PMCID: PMC2868334
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.007
Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?
Abstract
Should the results of whole genome sequencing research be disclosed to participants, in particular when the results have uncertain or indeterminate phenotypic consequences? This controversial question is considered in light of one author's (J.L.) experience as a geneticist who recently had his own genome sequenced.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Disclosure of Genome Sequencing Results: Are Pediatricians Ready?Pediatrics. 2015 Oct;136(4):e1005-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1740. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Pediatrics. 2015. PMID: 26371190 No abstract available.
-
To know or not to know the genomic sequence of a fetus.Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Oct;13(10):676-7. doi: 10.1038/nrg3333. Epub 2012 Sep 4. Nat Rev Genet. 2012. PMID: 22945393 No abstract available.
-
Should genetic findings from genome research be reported back to the participants?Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Oct 16;132(19):2190-3. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0078. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012. PMID: 23243670 Review. English, Norwegian.
-
Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;25(3):280-292. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.178. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 28051073 Free PMC article.
-
Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine.Br Med Bull. 2014 Sep;111(1):17-30. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldu017. Epub 2014 Aug 13. Br Med Bull. 2014. PMID: 25122627 Review.
Cited by
-
How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.J Community Genet. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00733-8. Online ahead of print. J Community Genet. 2024. PMID: 39325315
-
Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;30(9):1000-1010. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y. Epub 2022 Jun 15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 35705790 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants.J Community Genet. 2021 Oct;12(4):577-592. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00536-1. Epub 2021 Jul 9. J Community Genet. 2021. PMID: 34241790 Free PMC article.
-
Revised Common Rule Changes to the Consent Process and Consent Form.Ochsner J. 2020 Spring;20(1):62-75. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0055. Ochsner J. 2020. PMID: 32284685 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202502. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30114272 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Drmanac R, et al. Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science. 2009 Nov 5; Epub ahead of print. - PubMed
-
- Wheeler DA, et al. The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature. 2008;452:872–876. - PubMed
-
- Lupski JR, et al. Complete genome sequencing reveals SH3TC2 mutations causing CMT1 neuropathy. New Engl J Med in press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
