Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;22(3):170-8.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq015. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units

Affiliations

Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units

Isabella De Giorgi et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse safety risks in injectable medications. To assess the potential impact and pharmacoeconomic aspects of safety tools.

Design: The injectable drug process was prospectively assessed using a failure modes, effects and criticality analysis. Criticality indexes were estimated based on their likelihood of occurrence, detection probability and potential severity. The impact of 10 safety tools on the criticality index was calculated and extrapolated to all drugs injected daily. Yearly costs for a reduction in criticality by 1 point (=1 quali) per day were estimated.

Setting: Paediatric and neonatal intensive care units in a University Hospital.

Participants: Two paediatric nurses, a neonatologist, three hospital pharmacists.

Interventions: Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment.

Main outcome measures: Failure modes, criticality indexes, cost-efficacy ratios.

Results: Thirty-one failure modes identified, with the mean of their entire criticality indexes totalling 4540. The most critical failure mode was microbial contamination. The following gains were predicted: 1292 quali (46 500 per day by extrapolation) from ready-to-use syringes, 1201 (72 060) by employing a clinical pharmacist, 996 (59 780) from double check by nurses and 984 (59 040) with computerized physician order entry. The best cost-efficacy ratios were obtained for a clinical pharmacist (1 quali = 0.54 euros), double check (1 quali = 0.71 euros) and ready-to-use syringes (1 quali = 0.72 euros). Computerized physician order entry showed the worst cost-efficacy ratio due to a very high investment costs (1 quali = 22.47 euros).

Conclusion: Based on our risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses, clinical pharmacy and ready-to-use syringes appear as the most promising safety tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources