Drosophila immune response: From systemic antimicrobial peptide production in fat body cells to local defense in the intestinal tract
- PMID: 20383054
- DOI: 10.4161/fly.4.1.10810
Drosophila immune response: From systemic antimicrobial peptide production in fat body cells to local defense in the intestinal tract
Abstract
The innate immune response was once considered to be a limited set of responses that aims to contain an infection by primitive "ingest and kill" mechanisms, thus giving the host time to mount a more specific humoral and cellular immune response. It is now known that the innate immune response is a complex integrated response involving multiple players that work together to eliminate the pathogen. The fruit fly has been a great model to decipher various aspects of the immune response of invertebrates, including the transcriptional regulation of the antimicrobial genes during systemic response. Various reports have recently shown that Drosophila can also be used as a model system to study the mechanisms that control epithelial immune responses and more specifically gut immunity. We will present here our current knowledge on the genetic control of antimicrobial peptides production and recent progress made in our comprehension of the mechanisms through which Drosophila gut epithelium tolerates commensal microbiota yet remains able to mount an efficient immune response to food-borne pathogens.
Similar articles
-
Innate immunity and gut-microbe mutualism in Drosophila.Dev Comp Immunol. 2010 Apr;34(4):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Dec 10. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010. PMID: 19958789 Review.
-
Antimicrobial peptides extend lifespan in Drosophila.PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176689. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28520752 Free PMC article.
-
The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster.Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:697-743. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007. PMID: 17201680 Review.
-
Proprotein convertase Furin1 expression in the Drosophila fat body is essential for a normal antimicrobial peptide response and bacterial host defense.FASEB J. 2017 Nov;31(11):4770-4782. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700296R. Epub 2017 Jul 13. FASEB J. 2017. PMID: 28705811
-
Interactions Between the Gut Microbiota and the Host Innate Immune Response Against Pathogens.Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 29;10:607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00607. eCollection 2019. Front Immunol. 2019. PMID: 30984184 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Spatial profiling of nuclear receptor transcription patterns over the course of Drosophila development.G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Jul 8;3(7):1177-89. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.006023. G3 (Bethesda). 2013. PMID: 23665880 Free PMC article.
-
Highly specific host-pathogen interactions influence Metarhizium brunneum blastospore virulence against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.Virulence. 2018;9(1):1449-1467. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1509665. Virulence. 2018. PMID: 30112970 Free PMC article.
-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Musca domestica L.: temporospatial examination of bacteria population dynamics and house fly antimicrobial responses.PLoS One. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e79224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079224. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24260174 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Trypanosoma cruzi on antimicrobial peptide gene expression and activity in the fat body and midgut of Rhodnius prolixus.Parasit Vectors. 2016 Mar 1;9:119. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1398-4. Parasit Vectors. 2016. PMID: 26931761 Free PMC article.
-
M1-linked ubiquitination by LUBEL is required for inflammatory responses to oral infection in Drosophila.Cell Death Differ. 2019 May;26(5):860-876. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0164-x. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Cell Death Differ. 2019. PMID: 30026495 Free PMC article.