Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
, 34 (5), 747-54

Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Drilling Techniques in ACL Reconstruction: A Blinded Cross-Sectional Study at Two- To Five-Year Follow-Up

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Drilling Techniques in ACL Reconstruction: A Blinded Cross-Sectional Study at Two- To Five-Year Follow-Up

Eduard Alentorn-Geli et al. Int Orthop.

Abstract

Drilling of the femoral tunnel with the transtibial (TT) technique is widely used in bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Recent studies suggest higher knee stability with the use of the anteromedial portal (AMP). The purpose of this study was to compare functional and clinical outcomes of BPTB ACL reconstruction using the TT or the AMP technique for drilling the femoral tunnel. All ACL reconstructions between January 2003 and April 2006 were approached for eligibility. Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria (21 TT group and 26 AMP group). Blinded assessments of IKDC score, knee stability and range of motion, one-leg hop test, mid-quadriceps circumference, VAS for satisfaction with surgery, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and SF-12 questionnaire were obtained for both groups. Data on preoperative and postoperative surgical timing were retrospectively reviewed through the charts. The AMP group demonstrated a significantly lower recovery time from surgery to walking without crutches (p < 0.01), to return to normal life (p < 0.03), to return jogging (p < 0.03), to return training (p < 0.03), and to return to play (p < 0.03). Knee stability values measured with KT-1000, Lachman test, pivot-shift sign, and objective IKDC score assessments were significantly better for the AMP compared to TT group (p < 0.002, p < 0.03, p < 0.02, p < 0.015, respectively). No differences were found for VAS for satisfaction with surgery, Lysholm, Tegner, and SF-12 between both groups. The use of the AMP technique significantly improved the anterior-posterior and rotational knee stability, IKDC scores, and recovery time from surgery compared to the TT technique.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. *Indicates non significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). ACL anterior cruciate ligament, TT transtibial drilling technique, AMP anteromedial portal drilling technique, BMI body mass index, ROM range of motion, IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee, SF-12 short form-12, VAS visual analogue scale

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 42 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Feedback