Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 20:5:28.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-5-28.

A mathematical model of bone remodeling dynamics for normal bone cell populations and myeloma bone disease

Affiliations

A mathematical model of bone remodeling dynamics for normal bone cell populations and myeloma bone disease

Bruce P Ayati et al. Biol Direct. .

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy associated with the development of a destructive osteolytic bone disease.

Results: Mathematical models are developed for normal bone remodeling and for the dysregulated bone remodeling that occurs in myeloma bone disease. The models examine the critical signaling between osteoclasts (bone resorption) and osteoblasts (bone formation). The interactions of osteoclasts and osteoblasts are modeled as a system of differential equations for these cell populations, which exhibit stable oscillations in the normal case and unstable oscillations in the myeloma case. In the case of untreated myeloma, osteoclasts increase and osteoblasts decrease, with net bone loss as the tumor grows. The therapeutic effects of targeting both myeloma cells and cells of the bone marrow microenvironment on these dynamics are examined.

Conclusions: The current model accurately reflects myeloma bone disease and illustrates how treatment approaches may be investigated using such computational approaches.

Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Ariosto Silva and Mark P. Little.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the effects of myeloma on the autocrine and paracrine signaling in the osteoclast and osteoblast cell populations in the presence of tumor. The model of bone remodeling without tumor is taken from [22], including the meaning of the parameters g11 (osteoclast autocrine signaling), g12 (osteoclast stimulation of osteoblast production), g21 (osteoblast inhibition of osteoclast production), and g22 (osteoblast autocrine signaling). The tumor cells alter these interactions through modifications of the parameters g11, g12, g21, g22.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A single event of normal bone remodeling initiated by a momentary perturbation of the osteoclast nontrivial steady state population by an increase of 10 cell units. System of equations (1): The osteoclast population first decreases with a consequent increase in osteoblast population and a resorption of bone mass, followed by a return to steady-state levels. The blue line represents the steady-state solution. The parameters are α1 = 3.0, α2 = 4.0, β1 = 0.2, β2 = .02, g11 = .5, g22 = 0.0, g12 = 1.0, and g21 = -0.5. The nontrivial steady state with these parameters is formula image = 1.06 and formula image = 212.13. The initial conditions are C(0) = 11.06 and B(0) = 212.13. The bone mass parameters are k1 = .24, k2 = .0017, as in [22].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Simulation of oscillatory changes in osteoclast and osteoblast populations during normal bone modeling for which the model solutions are periodic. System of equations (1): The oscillations are stimulated by an initial increase in the number of osteoclasts by 10 cell units above the nontrivial steady state. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 2, except that g11 = 1.1. The nontrivial steady state is formula image = 1.16, formula image = 231.72, the initial conditions are C(0) = 11.16, B(0) = 231.72, and the bone mass parameters are k1 = .0748, k2 = .0006395. The bone mass oscillates about a normalized value of 100.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The osteoclast and osteoblast populations in the presence of tumor stimulated by an initial osteoclast population elevated above the nontrivial steady state by 10 cell units. System of equations (7): The osteoclast population first increases as the osteoblast population decreases. The solutions converge to the nontrivial steady state formula image = 5.0 and formula image = 316.0 with damped oscillations. The parameters are α1 = 3.0, α2 = 4.0, β1 = 0.2, β2 = .02, g11 = 1.1, g22 = 0.0, g12 = 1.0, g21 = -0.5, γT = .005, LT = 100, r11 = .005, r21 = 0.0, r12 = 0.0, r22 = 0.2. The initial conditions are C(0) = 15.0, B(0) = 316.0, T(0) = 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Bone mass and tumor response to the oscillations in Fig. 4. System of equations (7): The bone mass converges with oscillations to 0.0 and the tumor converges to maximum capacity LT. The parameters are as in Fig. 4. The bone mass parameters are k1 = .0748, k2 = .0006395 as in Fig. 3.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The osteoclast and osteoblast populations in the presence of tumor exhibit unstable oscillations. System of equations (7): The parameters are as in Fig. 4 except r11 = .02. The nontrivial steady state is formula image = 5.46 and formula image = 340.52. The initial conditions are C(0) = 8.46, B(0) = 340.52, T(0) = 1.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The effect of the unstable oscillations in Fig. 6 on bone mass. System of equations (7): The bone mass decreases with oscillations to 0.0. The tumor converges to maximum capacity LT as in Fig. 5. The parameters are as in Fig. 4, except that r11 = .02. The bone mass parameters are k1 = .0748, k2 = 0006395 as in Fig. 3.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The behavior of the solutions as a function of the tumor parameters r11 and r22. System of equations (7): The red surface is the plot of Φ = β1(g11(1 + r11) 1) + β2(g22 - r22 - 1) as a function of r11 and r22 (as in (11)). If the point on the surface corresponding to (r11, r22) is negative, then the solutions have decreasing amplitude oscillations converging to the nontrivial steady state; if positive, then the solutions have increasing amplitude and unstable oscillations. The values r11 = .005 and r22 = 0.2 in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 correspond to -.00145 on the red surface, and the solutions converge slowly to the nontrivial steady state formula image = 5.0, formula image = 316.0. The values r11 = .02 and r22 = 0.2 in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 correspond to .0002 on the red surface, and the solutions are unstable. The other parameters are r12 = 0, r21 = 0, α1 = 3.0, α2 = 4.0, β1 = 0.2, β2 = .02, g11 = 1.1, g22 = 0.0, g12 = 1.0, g21 = -0.5, γT = .005, LT = 100.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Treatment of the tumor model in Fig. 4 starts at tstart = 600 with intensity values v1 = .001 and v2 = .008. System of equations (7): Treatment reverses the disruption of the osteoclasts' and osteoblasts' interaction induced by the tumor (compare to Fig. 4). The parameter values are as in Fig. 4 and the initial conditions are C(0) = 13.0 and B(0) = 300.0.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The tumor is extinguished and the bone mass begins to recover (compare to Fig. 5). System of equations (7): The parameters are as in Fig. 9 and the bone mass parameters are k1 = .0748, k2 = 0006395 as in Fig. 3.
Figure 11
Figure 11
The graph of the initial distribution C(0, x) for the bone model with an additional spatial dimension. System of equations (14): Osteoclast numbers are initially elevated above the normal nontrivial steady state formula image(x) ≡ 1.16 at multiple sites. The initial distribution B(0, x) = formula image(x) ≡ 231.72 is taken as the normal constant nontrivial steady state.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Graphs of the solutions C(t, x) and B(t, x) of the bone model with an additional spatial dimension. System of equations (14): We take C(0, x) as in Fig. 11 and B(0, x) = formula image(x) ≡ 231.72. The solutions sustain regular spatial and temporal cycles characteristic of normal bone remodeling.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Left side: Graph of the bone mass z(t, x) for the spatially dependent normal bone model with C(0, x) and B(0, x) as in Fig. 11 and B(0, x) = formula image(x) ≡ 231.72. Right side: Density plot of the bone mass. System of equations (14): The bone mass sustains regular spatial and temporal cycles uctuating about a normalized value of 100 dimensionless cell units.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Graphs of the solutions C(t, x) and B(t, x) of the spatially dependent bone model with tumor and with C(0, x) and B(0, x) as in Fig. 11. System of equations (15): The solutions lose regular spatial and temporal cycles and converge to the nontrivial steady states formula image = 5.0, formula image = 316.0 (compare to Fig. 4 and Fig. 12).
Figure 15
Figure 15
The graph (left side) and density plot (right side) of the bone mass z(t, x) for the spatially dependent bone model with tumor. System of equations (15): C(0, x) and B(0, x) are as in Fig. 11 (compare to Fig. 13).
Figure 16
Figure 16
Left side: Graph of the untreated tumor population T(t, x) for the spatially dependent bone model with tumor and with C(0, x) and B(0, x) as in Fig. 11. System of equations (15): The tumor is initially small and located on the right side of Ω = [0, 1]. The tumor density T(t, x) converges to capacity LT for all x ∈ Ω as time increases. Right side: Graph of the treated tumor population T(t, x). The tumor is extinguished as time increases.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Graphs of the solutions C(t, x) and B(t, x) for the spatially dependent bone model with tumor and treatment. System of equations (16): The solutions recover regular spatial and temporal cycles after treatment begins at tstart = 600 (compare to Fig. 12 and Fig. 14).
Figure 18
Figure 18
The graph (left side) and density plot (right side) of the bone mass z(t, x) for the spatially dependent bone model with tumor and treatment (compare to Fig. 15). System of equations (16): Treatment stops the loss of bone mass from the advance of the tumor from the right side to the left side of the spatial region Ω = [0, 1] after initiation at tstart = 600. Bone mass already lost is not recovered on the right side of Ω as treatment continues.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parfit AM. Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. 1994;55:273–86. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240550303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin MJ, Buckland-Wright JC. Sensitivity analysis of a novel mathematical model identifies factors determining bone resorption rates. Bone. 2004;35:918–928. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lekszycki T. Functional Adaptation of Bone as an Optimal Control Problem. J Theoretical Applied Mechanics. 2005;43(3):555–574.
    1. Maldonado S, Borchers S, Findeisen R, Allgöwer F. Mathematical Modeling and Analysis of Force Induced Bone Growth. Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York. 2006. - PubMed
    1. Martínez G, Aznar JMG, Doblaré M, Cerrolaza M. External bone remodeling through boundary elements and damage mechanics. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 2006;73:183–199. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2006.06.014. - DOI

Publication types