Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation
- PMID: 20407059
- PMCID: PMC3073449
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.451
Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation
Abstract
Context: Cochlear implantation is a surgical alternative to traditional amplification (hearing aids) that can facilitate spoken language development in young children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
Objective: To prospectively assess spoken language acquisition following cochlear implantation in young children.
Design, setting, and participants: Prospective, longitudinal, and multidimensional assessment of spoken language development over a 3-year period in children who underwent cochlear implantation before 5 years of age (n = 188) from 6 US centers and hearing children of similar ages (n = 97) from 2 preschools recruited between November 2002 and December 2004. Follow-up completed between November 2005 and May 2008.
Main outcome measures: Performance on measures of spoken language comprehension and expression (Reynell Developmental Language Scales).
Results: Children undergoing cochlear implantation showed greater improvement in spoken language performance (10.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-11.2 points per year in comprehension; 8.4; 95% CI, 7.8-9.0 in expression) than would be predicted by their preimplantation baseline scores (5.4; 95% CI, 4.1-6.7, comprehension; 5.8; 95% CI, 4.6-7.0, expression), although mean scores were not restored to age-appropriate levels after 3 years. Younger age at cochlear implantation was associated with significantly steeper rate increases in comprehension (1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7 points per year younger) and expression (1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 points per year younger). Similarly, each 1-year shorter history of hearing deficit was associated with steeper rate increases in comprehension (0.8; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2 points per year shorter) and expression (0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0 points per year shorter). In multivariable analyses, greater residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation, higher ratings of parent-child interactions, and higher socioeconomic status were associated with greater rates of improvement in comprehension and expression.
Conclusion: The use of cochlear implants in young children was associated with better spoken language learning than would be predicted from their preimplantation scores.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation on language development.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Jan;166(1):28-34. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.748. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012. PMID: 22213747
-
Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age.Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 16672797 Free PMC article.
-
[Audiophonological evaluation of 16 children fitted with cochlear implants for sensorineural hearing loss induced by bacterial meningitis].Arch Pediatr. 2013 Jun;20(6):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 23. Arch Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23623157 French.
-
Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:50-65. doi: 10.1159/000094644. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16891836 Review.
-
Language outcomes after cochlear implantation.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;45(1):173-85. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22115689 Review.
Cited by
-
Microstructural Changes in the Brainstem Auditory Pathway in Children With Hearing Loss.Otol Neurotol. 2024 Mar 1;45(3):e170-e176. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004129. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Otol Neurotol. 2024. PMID: 38361295
-
Characterizing correlations in partial credit speech recognition scoring with beta-binomial distributions.JASA Express Lett. 2024 Feb 1;4(2):025202. doi: 10.1121/10.0024633. JASA Express Lett. 2024. PMID: 38299983 Free PMC article.
-
Language, cognitive, and speech in noise perception abilities of children with cochlear ımplants: a comparative analysis by implantation period and bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08462-x. Online ahead of print. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38244031
-
Children then, adults now: long-term outcomes-performance at 15, 20, and 25 years of cochlear implant use.Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Dec 14;4:1275808. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1275808. eCollection 2023. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023. PMID: 38170021 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity assessment of a survey: Measuring satisfaction with cochlear implant rehabilitation services for children in Jordan.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 18;18(12):e0295939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295939. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38109288 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bradham T, Jones J. Cochlear implant candidacy in the United States: prevalence in children 12 months to 6 years of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(7):1023–1028. - PubMed
-
- Niparko JK. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. JAMA. 2004;291(19):2378–2380. - PubMed
-
- Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ, Dowell RC, Leigh JR. Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):11S–18S. - PubMed
-
- Geers A, Tobey E, Moog J, Brenner C. Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in the preschool years: from elementary grades to high school. Int J Audiol. 2008;47 (Suppl 2):S21–S30. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
