Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis
- PMID: 20409499
- PMCID: PMC2946825
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.021
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis
Abstract
Background: Barriers experienced by patients influence the uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Prior research has quantified how often patients encounter these challenges but has generally not revealed their complex perspective and experience with barriers.
Purpose: This mixed-methods study was conducted to understand current perspectives on CRC screening.
Methods: A two-part, mixed-methods study was conducted of primary care patients recruited from Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network practices. First, in June-July 2005 a survey was mailed to 660 patients aged 50-75 years posing an open-ended question about "the most important barrier" to CRC screening. Second, beginning in October 2005, seven gender- and largely race-specific focus groups involving 40 patients aged 45-75 years were conducted. Beginning in October 2005, survey verbatim responses were coded and quantitatively analyzed and focus group transcripts were qualitatively analyzed.
Results: Responses to the open-ended survey question, answered by 74% of respondents, identified fear and the bowel preparation as the most important barriers to screening. Only 1.6% of responses cited the absence of physician advice. Focus group participants cited similar issues and other previously reported barriers, but their remarks exposed the intricacies of complex barriers, such as fear, lack of information, time, the role of physicians, and access to care. Participants also cited barriers that have little documentation in the literature, such as low self-worth, "para-sexual" sensitivities, fatalism, negative past experiences with testing, and skepticism about the financial motivation behind screening recommendations.
Conclusions: Mixed-methods analysis helps to disaggregate the complex nuances that influence patient behavior. In the present study, patients explained the web of influences on knowledge, motivation, and ability to undergo CRC screening, which clinicians and policymakers should consider in designing interventions to increase the level of screening.
2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Am J Prev Med. 2010 May;38(5):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Mar 28. Am J Prev Med. 2010. PMID: 20347555 Free PMC article.
-
Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.Cancer Control. 2007 Apr;14(2):167-75. doi: 10.1177/107327480701400210. Cancer Control. 2007. PMID: 17387302
-
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs.Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):148-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00430.x. Health Expect. 2007. PMID: 17524008 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators in older persons.Prev Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1-2):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.12.005. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Prev Med. 2010. PMID: 20006644 Review.
-
Patients' experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context--a systematic review of the literature.Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 2. Patient Educ Couns. 2012. PMID: 21640543 Review.
Cited by
-
A consultation and work-up diagnosis protocol for a multicancer early detection test: a case series study.Future Sci OA. 2024 Dec 31;10(1):2395244. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2024.2395244. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Future Sci OA. 2024. PMID: 39254097 Free PMC article.
-
An investigation of plasma cell-free RNA for the detection of colorectal cancer: From transcriptome marker selection to targeted validation.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308711. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39146279 Free PMC article.
-
A Patient-Centered Approach to Communication during Endoscopic Procedures: The Importance of Providing Information to Patients.Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jun 9;14(6):1688-1699. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14060111. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024. PMID: 38921077 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Colorectal Cancer Prediction Model: A Nationwide Cohort-Based Study.Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Jul;69(7):2611-2620. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08427-4. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Dig Dis Sci. 2024. PMID: 38662163 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in the five regions of Georgia.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301027. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38547204 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
-
- Levin B, Lieberman D, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–95. - PubMed
-
-
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008 2008 Nov 4;149(9):627–37. Epub 2008 Oct 6. Summary for patients in: Ann Intern Med 2008 Nov 4;149(9):1–44.
-
-
- CDC Use of colorectal cancer tests—U.S., 2002, 2004, 2006. MMWR. 2008;57(10):253–8. - PubMed
-
- Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(19):1406–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
