Exploring the use of seclusion and restraint with deaf psychiatric patients: comparisons with hearing patients

Psychiatr Q. 2010 Dec;81(4):303-9. doi: 10.1007/s11126-010-9139-x.

Abstract

Archival data of seclusion and restraint events in a group of deaf adults (n = 30) was compared with a random sample of hearing adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) (n = 30) and a random sample of hearing adults without ID (n = 51) admitted to a state hospital from 1998 to 2008. Only 12% of the hearing non-ID group experienced a seclusion or restraint versus 43% of the deaf group. The ID group also showed significantly higher rates of seclusion and restraint than the hearing non-ID group (30 vs. 12%). Patients in the deaf and ID group were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with impulse control disorders (23 and 23%, respectively), which may have contributed to the higher utilization of seclusion and restraint procedures in these groups. Deafness-related cultural and linguistic variables that impact the use of seclusion and restraint are reviewed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Comorbidity
  • Deafness / diagnosis
  • Deafness / epidemiology
  • Deafness / therapy*
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders / psychology
  • Female
  • Hospitals, State
  • Humans
  • Inpatients / psychology*
  • Intellectual Disability / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis
  • Mental Disorders / epidemiology
  • Mental Disorders / physiopathology*
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Isolation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Persons With Hearing Impairments / psychology*
  • Persons With Hearing Impairments / statistics & numerical data
  • Restraint, Physical / statistics & numerical data*
  • Treatment Outcome