The way you make me feel: evidence for individual differences in affective presence
- PMID: 20424091
- DOI: 10.1177/0956797610364117
The way you make me feel: evidence for individual differences in affective presence
Abstract
How much do individuals consistently influence the way other people feel? Data from 48 work groups suggest there are consistent individual differences both in the emotions that people tend to experience (trait affect) and in the emotions that people tend to elicit in others (trait affective presence). A social relations model analysis revealed that after controlling for emotional contagion, the variance in emotions that people feel is explained by both trait affect (31% of positive affect and 19% of negative affect) and trait affective presence (10% of positive affect and 23% of negative affect). These analyses suggest that affective presence exerts as much influence over interaction partners' negative feelings as does these interaction partners' own trait affect. Positive affective presence correlated with greater network centrality, and negative affective presence correlated with lower agreeableness and greater extraversion.
Similar articles
-
Affective synchrony: individual differences in mixed emotions.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;33(7):915-32. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301009. Epub 2007 Jun 5. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007. PMID: 17551163
-
[Affective contagion at work. Causes and effects of collective moods and emotions].Med Pr. 2010;61(2):223-32. Med Pr. 2010. PMID: 20509559 Review. Polish.
-
Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment.Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):262-74. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.262. Emotion. 2007. PMID: 17516805
-
Evaluating the relation between psychopathy and affective empathy: two preliminary studies.Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012 Dec;56(8):1161-81. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11421891. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012. PMID: 22094599
-
Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits.J Pers. 2005 Feb;73(1):183-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00308.x. J Pers. 2005. PMID: 15660677 Review.
Cited by
-
The Social Dynamics of Fun: Can Fun Youth Bring Peers Together and Positively Influence Their Friends?J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Feb;53(2):386-396. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01876-6. Epub 2023 Sep 29. J Youth Adolesc. 2024. PMID: 37775691
-
Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions.Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:882162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35707646 Free PMC article.
-
Leader Affective Presence and Feedback in Teams.Front Psychol. 2020 May 5;11:705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00705. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32431637 Free PMC article.
-
Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 12;114(37):9843-9847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702155114. Epub 2017 Aug 29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 28851835 Free PMC article.
-
Well-Being and Institutional Care in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional and Time Effects of Provided and Received Support.PLoS One. 2016 Aug 22;11(8):e0161328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161328. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27548721 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
