Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the reliability of the 2 most commonly used ultrasonographic approaches for monitoring fetal atrioventricular conduction time (AVCT): (1) superior vena cava/ascending aorta (SVC/AA), and (2) left ventricular inflow/outflow tract (LVI/O) Doppler recordings.
Study design: Echographic studies from fetuses followed up for first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB-1) between 1998 and 2008 were reviewed. The ability to identify atrial contractions in the same fetuses by the SVC/AA and LVI/O approaches was analyzed.
Results: Sixty-six studies of 13 fetuses with AVB-1 were available. Atrial contractions were visible in all SVC/AA studies. With the LVI/O approach, atrial contractions could not be identified in 26 studies (39%). AVCT delay was significantly greater in the nonidentifiable compared with the identifiable atrial contraction group (P < .001). Differences in heart rate and gestational age were not significant.
Conclusion: The LVI/O is unsuitable for prenatal screening of conduction system anomalies.
Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.