Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years
- PMID: 20439838
- PMCID: PMC2902813
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq090
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years
Abstract
Background: Few data have been published on mammography performance in women who are younger than 40 years.
Methods: We pooled data from six mammography registries across the United States from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. We included 117 738 women who were aged 18-39 years when they had their first screening or diagnostic mammogram during 1995-2005 and followed them for 1 year to determine accuracy of mammography assessment. We measured the recall rate for screening examinations and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and cancer detection rate for all mammograms.
Results: For screening mammograms, no cancers were detected in 637 mammograms for women aged 18-24 years. For women aged 35-39 years who had the largest number of screening mammograms (n = 73 335) in this study, the recall rate was 12.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 12.9%), sensitivity was 76.1% (95% CI = 69.2% to 82.6%), specificity was 87.5% (95% CI = 87.2% to 87.7%), positive predictive value was 1.3% (95% CI = 1.1% to 1.5%), and cancer detection rate was 1.6 cancers per 1000 mammograms (95% CI = 1.3 to 1.9 cancers per 1000 mammograms). Most (67 468 [77.7%]) of the 86 871 women screened reported no family history of breast cancer. For diagnostic mammograms, the age-adjusted rates across all age groups were: sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI = 82.7% to 88.7%), specificity of 88.8% (95% CI = 88.4% to 89.1%), positive predictive value of 14.6% (95% CI = 13.3% to 15.8%), and cancer detection rate of 14.3 cancers per 1000 mammograms (95% CI = 13.0 to 15.7 cancers per 1000 mammograms). Mammography performance, except for specificity, improved in the presence of a breast lump.
Conclusions: Younger women have very low breast cancer rates but after mammography experience high recall rates, high rates of additional imaging, and low cancer detection rates. We found no cancers in women younger than 25 years and poor performance for the large group of women aged 35-39 years. In a theoretical population of 10 000 women aged 35-39 years, 1266 women who are screened will receive further workup, with 16 cancers detected and 1250 women receiving a false-positive result.
Figures
Comment in
-
Mammography in younger women: the dilemma of diminishing returns.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 19;102(10):668-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq137. Epub 2010 May 3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 20439837 No abstract available.
-
Performance of mammography in women aged under 40 years.Womens Health (Lond). 2010 Sep;6(5):665-7. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.52. Womens Health (Lond). 2010. PMID: 20887165 No abstract available.
-
Re: Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Nov 17;102(22):1742; author reply 1742, 1742-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq396. Epub 2010 Oct 21. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 20966429 No abstract available.
-
Mammography in women younger than 40 shows poor performance characteristics and low rates of cancer detection.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(2):178-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2010.00054_2.x. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011. PMID: 21429086 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):97-104. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423608. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998. PMID: 9423608
-
Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211974. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1974. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33764423 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26414882 Free PMC article.
-
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. PMID: 26866210 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Diagnostic Breast Imaging Outcomes in Young Women at a Tertiary Care Center.Curr Oncol. 2024 Jul 6;31(7):3939-3948. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070291. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39057163 Free PMC article.
-
Population simulation modeling of disparities in US breast cancer mortality.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 Nov 8;2023(62):178-187. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad023. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023. PMID: 37947337 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodal analysis of genome-wide methylation, copy number aberrations, and end motif signatures enhances detection of early-stage breast cancer.Front Oncol. 2023 May 8;13:1127086. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1127086. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37223690 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathologic Features of Breast Cancer in Egypt-Contemporary Profile and Future Needs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Mar;9:e2200387. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00387. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36888929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast Cancer in the United Arab Emirates.JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jan;9:e2200247. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00247. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36608306 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures, 2009. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, Inc.; 2009.
-
- Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/. Accessed November 11, 2008.
-
- Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Bodian C, Brower ST. Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(5):523–529. - PubMed
-
- Rosenberg J, Chia YL, Plevritis S. The effect of age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, and disease stage on invasive ductal breast cancer survival in the U.S. SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89(1):47–54. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
