Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease
- PMID: 20445180
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910496
Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have established the superiority of coronary everolimus-eluting stents over paclitaxel-eluting stents with respect to angiographic findings. However, these trials were not powered for superiority in clinical end points.
Methods: We randomly assigned 3687 patients at 66 U.S. sites to receive everolimus-eluting stents or paclitaxel-eluting stents without routine follow-up angiography. The primary end point was the 1-year composite rate of target-lesion failure (defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization).
Results: Everolimus-eluting stents were superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents with respect to the primary end point of target-lesion failure (4.2% vs. 6.8%; relative risk, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.82; P=0.001). Everolimus-eluting stents were also superior with respect to the major secondary end point of the 1-year rate of ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (P=0.001) and were noninferior with respect to the major secondary end point of the 1-year composite rate of cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.09 for superiority). The 1-year rates of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were also lower with everolimus-eluting stents than with paclitaxel-eluting stents (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P=0.02 for myocardial infarction; 0.17% vs. 0.85%, P=0.004 for stent thrombosis). Target-lesion failure was consistently reduced with everolimus-eluting stents as compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in 12 prespecified subgroups, except in the subgroup of patients with diabetes (6.4% vs. 6.9%, P=0.80).
Conclusions: Everolimus-eluting stents, as compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, resulted in reduced rates of target-lesion failure at 1 year, results that were consistent in all patients except those with diabetes, in whom the results were nonsignificantly different. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307047.)
2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Second-generation drug-eluting coronary stents.N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1728-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1001069. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20445185 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1946-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810116. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19420364 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):680-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. Epub 2009 Jan 26. Circulation. 2009. PMID: 19171853 Clinical Trial.
-
Paclitaxel-Eluting versus Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1709-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510188. Epub 2015 Oct 14. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 26466202 Clinical Trial.
-
A meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.047. Epub 2007 Aug 21. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17903638 Review.
-
Current status of the Xience V® everolimus-eluting coronary stent system.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Oct;8(10):1363-74. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.127. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010. PMID: 20936921 Review.
Cited by
-
First-in-Human Evaluation of a Polymer-Free Everolimus-Eluting Stent Using a Titanium Dioxide Film.J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 26;39(33):e234. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e234. J Korean Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39189711 Free PMC article.
-
Three-Year Clinical Outcomes With the Cilotax Dual Drug-Eluting Stent vs Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Tex Heart Inst J. 2024 May 1;51(1):e238271. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8271. Tex Heart Inst J. 2024. PMID: 38686684 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular Drug Delivery.Life (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;14(4):451. doi: 10.3390/life14040451. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672722 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A New Frontier for Drug-Coated Balloons: Treatment of "De Novo" Stenosis in Large Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 26;13(5):1320. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051320. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592181 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56925-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38491111 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical