Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;64(5):461-4.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.095158.

Work disability following major organisational change: the Whitehall II study

Affiliations

Work disability following major organisational change: the Whitehall II study

M Virtanen et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 May.

Abstract

Background: Privatisation and private sector practices have been increasingly applied to the public sector in many industrialised countries. Over the same period, long-term work disability has risen substantially. We examined whether a major organisational change--the transfer of public sector work to executive agencies run on private sector lines--was associated with an increased risk of work disability.

Methods: The study uses self-reported data from the prospective Whitehall II cohort study. Associations between transfer to an executive agency assessed at baseline (1991-1994) and work disability ascertained over a period of approximately 8 years at three follow-up surveys (1995-1996, 1997-1999 and 2001) were examined using Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: In age- and sex-adjusted models, risk of work disability was higher among the 1263 employees who were transferred to an executive agency (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.48) compared with the 3419 employees whose job was not transferred. These findings were robust to additional adjustment for physical and mental health and health behaviours at baseline.

Conclusions: Increased work disability was observed among employees exposed to the transfer of public sector work to executive agencies run on private sector lines. This may highlight an unintentional cost for employees, employers and society.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moncrieff J, Pomerleau J. Trends in sickness benefits in Great Britain and the contribution of mental disorders. J Public Health Policy. 2000;22:59–67. - PubMed
    1. Järvisalo J, Andersson B, Boedeker W, Houtman I, editors. Mental disorders as a major challenge in prevention of work disability. Vol. 66. Helsinki: Social Insurance Institution, Social Security and Health Reports; 2005.
    1. Holzmann R, Hinz R. Old age income support in the 21st century: an international perspective on pension systems and reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2005. pp. 3–56.
    1. OECD. Transforming disability into ability: policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2003. pp. 16–176.
    1. National Union of Civil and Public Servants. Agenda for the Future: The Civil Service towards the Twenty First Century. London: National Union of Civil and Public Servants; 1991.

Publication types

MeSH terms