Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis
- PMID: 20447954
- DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.127225
Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-a first step in a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) initiative to produce recommendations for the management of RA.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library was performed up to January 2009. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy of synthetic DMARDs (vs placebo or other synthetic DMARDs) on signs and symptoms, disability and/or radiographic structural damage in patients with RA were selected. Studies of biological agents or glucocorticoids were excluded. A pooled effect size (ES) was calculated by meta-analysis. Safety and the occurrence of infections and neoplasia was also assessed.
Results: 97 RCTs (14 159 patients) were analysed for efficacy. The pooled analysis indicated that methotrexate (MTX) was more efficacious in reducing signs and symptoms, disability and radiographic structural damage than other synthetic DMARDs pooled: ES for swollen joint count (SJC) versus pooled DMARDs=1.42 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.18). Leflunomide appeared to be as effective as MTX. Sulfasalazine and injectable gold were efficacious in reducing signs and symptoms and structural damage. Ciclosporin, minocycline, tacrolimus and hydroxychloroquine showed some efficacy in reducing SJC. Auranofin and D-penicillamine showed no significant superiority over placebo. The risks of cancer and of infection were increased with cyclophosphamide and azathioprine.
Conclusions: MTX was well-tolerated and effective in reducing signs and symptoms, disability and structural damage. A comparison with other synthetic DMARDs was in favour of MTX, though at the tested doses MTX and leflunomide were equally effective.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids and tofacitinib: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):510-5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204588. Epub 2014 Jan 6. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014. PMID: 24395555 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):529-35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204575. Epub 2014 Jan 8. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014. PMID: 24401994 Review.
-
Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):516-28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204577. Epub 2014 Jan 7. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014. PMID: 24399231 Review.
-
Efficacy of glucocorticoids, conventional and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1102-1107. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210711. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017. PMID: 28356243 Review.
-
Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of RA.Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jun;69(6):976-86. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.126573. Epub 2010 May 6. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010. PMID: 20447957 Review.
Cited by
-
Classification of Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Proposal for Revision.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 19;14(16):1803. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161803. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39202291 Free PMC article. Review.
-
2023 Management Recommendations of Bangladesh Rheumatology Society on Pharmacological Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Synthetic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Drugs.Cureus. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):e59395. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59395. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38707172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with screening practices for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51667-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38200168 Free PMC article.
-
Hydroxychloroquine-induced Retinal Toxicity.Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 30;14:1196783. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1196783. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37324471 Free PMC article. Review.
-
2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2021 Apr 13;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.2478/rir-2021-0002. eCollection 2021 Mar. Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2021. PMID: 36467901 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical