Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial
- PMID: 20453723
- PMCID: PMC3392200
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d
Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial
Abstract
Study design: Randomized trial and concurrent observational cohort study.
Objective: To compare 4 year outcomes of surgery to nonoperative care for spinal stenosis.
Summary of background data: Surgery for spinal stenosis has been shown to be more effective compared to nonoperative treatment over 2 years, but longer-term data have not been analyzed.
Methods: Surgical candidates from 13 centers in 11 US states with at least 12 weeks of symptoms and confirmatory imaging were enrolled in a randomized cohort (RC) or observational cohort (OC). Treatment was standard decompressive laminectomy or standard nonoperative care. Primary outcomes were SF-36 bodily pain (BP) and physical function scales and the modified Oswestry Disability index assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and yearly up to 4 years.
Results: A total of 289 patients enrolled in the RC and 365 patients enrolled in the OC. An as-treated analysis combining the RC and OC and adjusting for potential confounders found that the clinically significant advantages for surgery previously reported were maintained through 4 years, with treatment effects (defined as mean change in surgery group minus mean change in nonoperative group) for bodily pain 12.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5-16.7); physical function 8.6 (95% CI, 4.6-12.6); and Oswestry Disability index -9.4 (95% CI, -12.6 to -6.2). Early advantages for surgical treatment for secondary measures such as bothersomeness, satisfaction with symptoms, and self-rated progress were also maintained.
Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis treated surgically compared to those treated nonoperatively maintain substantially greater improvement in pain and function through 4 years.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000411.
Similar articles
-
Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1295-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. PMID: 19487505 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):63-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000731. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. PMID: 25569524 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):439-46. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdafb9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20081560 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review.JAMA. 2022 May 3;327(17):1688-1699. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35503342 Review.
-
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;(3):CD010036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25760812 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of percutaneous key lesion endoscopic lumbar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarian patients.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0300836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300836. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39570811 Free PMC article.
-
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Hypertrophy of Ligamentum Flavum.Biomolecules. 2024 Oct 10;14(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/biom14101277. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39456209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow-up from the NORDSTEN-SST.Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08514-0. Online ahead of print. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39448401
-
Role of unilateral partial facet joint preservation in postero-lateral approach lumbar interbody fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis presenting bilateral lower limb symptoms: a retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 3;19(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05020-3. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39223558 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of two-level decompressive procedures on the biomechanics of the lumbo-sacral spine: an ex vivo study.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jul 9;12:1400508. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1400508. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39045539 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis?: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, et al. The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:1787–94. discussion 94-5. - PubMed
-
- Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O’Brien MF, et al. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6:461–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
