US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008
- PMID: 20501926
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.650
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008
Abstract
Context: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and treatment and control of hypertension reduces risk. The Healthy People 2010 goal was to achieve blood pressure (BP) control in 50% of the US population.
Objective: To assess progress in treating and controlling hypertension in the United States from 1988-2008.
Design, setting, and participants: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988-1994 and 1999-2008 in five 2-year blocks included 42 856 adults aged older than 18 years, representing a probability sample of the US civilian population.
Main outcome measures: Hypertension was defined as systolic BP of at least 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP of at least 90 mm Hg, self-reported use of antihypertensive medications, or both. Hypertension control was defined as systolic BP values of less than 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP values of less than 90 mm Hg. All survey periods were age-adjusted to the year 2000 US population.
Results: Rates of hypertension increased from 23.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.7%-25.2%) in 1988-1994 to 28.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-31.3%; P < .001) in 1999-2000, but did not change between 1999-2000 and 2007-2008 (29.0%; 95% CI, 27.6%-30.5%; P = .24). Hypertension control increased from 27.3% (95% CI, 25.6%-29.1%) in 1988-1994 to 50.1% (95% CI, 46.8%-53.5%; P = .006) in 2007-2008, and BP among patients with hypertension decreased from 143.0/80.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 141.9-144.2/79.6-81.1 mm Hg) to 135.2/74.1 mm Hg (95% CI, 134.2-136.2/73.2-75.0 mm Hg; P = .02/P < .001). Blood pressure control improved significantly more in absolute percentages between 1999-2000 and 2007-2008 vs 1988-1994 and 1999-2000 (18.6%; 95% CI, 13.3%-23.9%; vs 4.1%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 8.8%; P < .001). Better BP control reflected improvements in awareness (69.1%; 95% CI, 67.1%-71.1%; vs 80.7%; 95% CI, 78.1%-83.0%; P for trend = .03), treatment (54.0%; 95% CI, 52.0%-56.1%; vs 72.5%; 95% CI, 70.1%-74.8%; P = .004), and proportion of patients who were treated and had controlled hypertension (50.6%; 95% CI, 48.0%-53.2%; vs 69.1%; 95% CI, 65.7%-72.3%; P = .006). Hypertension control improved significantly between 1988-1994 and 2007-2008, across age, race, and sex groups, but was lower among individuals aged 18 to 39 years vs 40 to 59 years (P < .001) and 60 years or older (P < .001), and in Hispanic vs white individuals (P = .004).
Conclusions: Blood pressure was controlled in an estimated 50.1% of all patients with hypertension in NHANES 2007-2008, with most of the improvement since 1988 occurring after 1999-2000. Hypertension control was significantly lower among younger than middle-aged individuals and older adults, and Hispanic vs white individuals.
Comment in
-
Improved hypertension control: cause for some celebration.JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2082-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.692. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20501932 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018.JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32902588 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000.JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):199-206. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.199. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 12851274
-
Gender differences in hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004.Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jul;21(7):789-98. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.185. Epub 2008 May 1. Am J Hypertens. 2008. PMID: 18451806
-
Hypertension in the elderly: can we improve results of therapy?Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 14;160(3):283-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.3.283. Arch Intern Med. 2000. PMID: 10668829 Review.
-
Establishing sound goals for hypertension management.JAAPA. 2007 Nov;Suppl Hypertension:9-13. doi: 10.1097/01720610-200711000-00006. JAAPA. 2007. PMID: 18050530 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the Efficacy of Renal Artery Denervation in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Oct 4;16(10):e70805. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70805. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39493034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trends in prevalence of hypertension and high-normal blood pressure among US adults, 1999-2018.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76869-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39462089 Free PMC article.
-
Respiratory failure and rhabdomyolysis caused by severe hypokalemia in a young female with hypertension: a rare critical condition in primary aldosteronism.BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01619-0. BMC Urol. 2024. PMID: 39407241 Free PMC article.
-
Use and Cost Patterns of Antihypertensive Medications in the United States From 1996 to 2021.Hypertension. 2024 Nov;81(11):2307-2317. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509. Epub 2024 Sep 4. Hypertension. 2024. PMID: 39229724
-
Hypertension Prevalence among Hispanics/Latinos of Dominican Background: A Transnational Comparison of HCHS/SOL and ENPREFAR-HAS-17.Glob Heart. 2024 Aug 26;19(1):71. doi: 10.5334/gh.1352. eCollection 2024. Glob Heart. 2024. PMID: 39219850 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
