Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital
- PMID: 20512531
- PMCID: PMC2955477
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1402-1
Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital
Abstract
Background: Poor communication between referring clinicians and specialists may lead to inefficient use of specialist services. San Francisco General Hospital implemented an electronic referral system (eReferral) that facilitates iterative pre-visit communication between referring and specialty clinicians to improve the referral process.
Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of eReferral (compared with paper-based referrals) on specialty referrals.
Design: The study was based on a visit-based questionnaire appended to new patient charts at randomly selected specialist clinic sessions before and after the implementation of eReferral.
Participants: Specialty clinicians.
Main measures: The questionnaire focused on the self-reported difficulty in identifying referral question, referral appropriateness, need for and avoidability of follow-up visits.
Key results: We collected 505 questionnaires from speciality clinicians. It was difficult to identify the reason for referral in 19.8% of medical and 38.0% of surgical visits using paper-based methods vs. 11.0% and 9.5% of those using eReferral (p-value 0.03 and <0.001). Of those using eReferral, 6.4% and 9.8% of medical and surgical referrals using paper methods vs. 2.6% and 2.1% were deemed not completely appropriate (p-value 0.21 and 0.03). Follow-up was requested for 82.4% and 76.2% of medical and surgical patients with paper-based referrals vs. 90.1% and 58.1% of eReferrals (p-value 0.06 and 0.01). Follow-up was considered avoidable for 32.4% and 44.7% of medical and surgical follow-ups with paper-based methods vs. 27.5% and 13.5% with eReferral (0.41 and <0.001).
Conclusion: Use of technology to promote standardized referral processes and iterative communication between referring clinicians and specialists has the potential to improve communication between primary care providers and specialists and to increase the effectiveness of specialty referrals.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Chen and Yee note that they have served as independent consultants for public, non-profit organizations interested in implementing the UCSF/SFGH eReferral model. No other authors report any conflicts or financial interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The impact of integrating electronic referral within a musculoskeletal model of care on wait time to receive orthopedic care in Ontario.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241624. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33141866 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging an electronic referral system to build a medical neighborhood.Healthc (Amst). 2015 Dec;3(4):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 2. Healthc (Amst). 2015. PMID: 26699344
-
Electronic referrals: what matters to the users.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:235-41. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012. PMID: 22797047
-
The current state of electronic consultation and electronic referral systems in Canada: an environmental scan.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;209:75-83. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015. PMID: 25980708 Review.
-
Electronic referral systems in health care: a scoping review.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 May 6;11:325-333. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S195597. eCollection 2019. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019. PMID: 31190925 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies on cross-level clinical coordination: A scoping review.Digit Health. 2024 Aug 9;10:20552076241271854. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271854. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39130524 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Successful Electronic Consultation Service Initiative in Quebec, Canada With Primary Care Physicians' and Specialists' Experiences on Acceptance and Use of Technological Innovation: Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 30;8:e52921. doi: 10.2196/52921. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 38814689 Free PMC article.
-
Does virtual consultation between primary and specialised care improve healthcare quality? A scoping review of healthcare quality domains assessment.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4):e002388. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002388. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 37832971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cerner Millennium's Care Pathways for Specialty Care Referrals: Provider and Nurse Experiences, Perceptions, and Recommendations for Improvements.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):1007-1014. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08285-2. Epub 2023 Oct 5. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37798582 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating barriers and facilitators to healthcare providers' use of an emergency department electronic referral portal for high-risk children with asthma using the Theoretical Domains Framework.J Asthma. 2024 Mar;61(3):184-193. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2257318. Epub 2023 Sep 13. J Asthma. 2024. PMID: 37688796
References
-
- Chen AH, Yee HF., Jr Improving the primary-specialty care interface: getting from here to there. Arch Int Med. 2009;169:1–3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
