Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;25(10):1123-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1402-1. Epub 2010 May 29.

Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital

Affiliations

Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital

Judy E Kim-Hwang et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Poor communication between referring clinicians and specialists may lead to inefficient use of specialist services. San Francisco General Hospital implemented an electronic referral system (eReferral) that facilitates iterative pre-visit communication between referring and specialty clinicians to improve the referral process.

Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of eReferral (compared with paper-based referrals) on specialty referrals.

Design: The study was based on a visit-based questionnaire appended to new patient charts at randomly selected specialist clinic sessions before and after the implementation of eReferral.

Participants: Specialty clinicians.

Main measures: The questionnaire focused on the self-reported difficulty in identifying referral question, referral appropriateness, need for and avoidability of follow-up visits.

Key results: We collected 505 questionnaires from speciality clinicians. It was difficult to identify the reason for referral in 19.8% of medical and 38.0% of surgical visits using paper-based methods vs. 11.0% and 9.5% of those using eReferral (p-value 0.03 and <0.001). Of those using eReferral, 6.4% and 9.8% of medical and surgical referrals using paper methods vs. 2.6% and 2.1% were deemed not completely appropriate (p-value 0.21 and 0.03). Follow-up was requested for 82.4% and 76.2% of medical and surgical patients with paper-based referrals vs. 90.1% and 58.1% of eReferrals (p-value 0.06 and 0.01). Follow-up was considered avoidable for 32.4% and 44.7% of medical and surgical follow-ups with paper-based methods vs. 27.5% and 13.5% with eReferral (0.41 and <0.001).

Conclusion: Use of technology to promote standardized referral processes and iterative communication between referring clinicians and specialists has the potential to improve communication between primary care providers and specialists and to increase the effectiveness of specialty referrals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Chen and Yee note that they have served as independent consultants for public, non-profit organizations interested in implementing the UCSF/SFGH eReferral model. No other authors report any conflicts or financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
eReferral screenshot.
Figure 2
Figure 2
eReferral process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen AH, Yee HF., Jr Improving the primary-specialty care interface: getting from here to there. Arch Int Med. 2009;169:1–3. - PubMed
    1. Kim Y, Chen AH, Keith E, Yee HF, Jr, Kushel MB. Not perfect, but better: primary care providers’ experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(5):614–619. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McPhee SJ, Lo B, Saika GY, Meltzer R. How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants? Arch Intern Med. 1984;144(6):1265–1268. doi: 10.1001/archinte.144.6.1265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK, Sittig DF, Franklin M, Sussman AJ, Fairchild DG, Bates DW. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):626–631. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood ML. Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors. Can Fam Physician. 1993;39:49–57. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms