Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 1:8:33.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-33.

US public opinion regarding proposed limits on resident physician work hours

Affiliations

US public opinion regarding proposed limits on resident physician work hours

Alexander B Blum et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: In both Europe and the US, resident physician work hour reduction has been a source of controversy within academic medicine. In 2008, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended a reduction in resident physician work hours. We sought to assess the American public perspective on this issue.

Methods: We conducted a national survey of 1,200 representative members of the public via random digit telephone dialing in order to describe US public opinion on resident physician work hour regulation, particularly with reference to the IOM recommendations.

Results: Respondents estimated that resident physicians currently work 12.9-h shifts (95% CI 12.5 to 13.3 h) and 58.3-h work weeks (95% CI 57.3 to 59.3 h). They believed the maximum shift duration should be 10.9 h (95% CI 10.6 to 11.3 h) and the maximum work week should be 50 h (95% CI 49.4 to 50.8 h), with 1% approving of shifts lasting >24 h (95% CI 0.6% to 2%). A total of 81% (95% CI 79% to 84%) believed reducing resident physician work hours would be very or somewhat effective in reducing medical errors, and 68% (95% CI 65% to 71%) favored the IOM proposal that resident physicians not work more than 16 h over an alternative IOM proposal permitting 30-h shifts with > or =5 h protected sleep time. In all, 81% believed patients should be informed if a treating resident physician had been working for >24 h and 80% (95% CI 78% to 83%) would then want a different doctor.

Conclusions: The American public overwhelmingly favors discontinuation of the 30-h shifts without protected sleep routinely worked by US resident physicians and strongly supports implementation of restrictions on resident physician work hours that are as strict, or stricter, than those proposed by the IOM. Strong support exists to restrict resident physicians' work to 16 or fewer consecutive hours, similar to current limits in New Zealand, the UK and the rest of Europe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for participation in national US public opinion survey.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Landrigan CP, Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, Czeisler CA. Interns' compliance with accreditation council for graduate medical education work-hour limits. JAMA. 2006;296:1063–1070. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Czeisler CA. Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:125–134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Czeisler CA. Medical and genetic differences in the adverse impact of sleep loss on performance: ethical considerations for the medical profession. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2009;120:249–285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hickner RC, Racette SB, Binder EF, Fisher JS, Kohrt WM. Suppression of whole body and regional lipolysis by insulin: effects of obesity and exercise. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:3886–3895. doi: 10.1210/jc.84.11.3886. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willis RE. Views of surgery Program Directors on the current ACGME and proposed IOM duty-hour standards. J Surg Educ. 2009;66:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources