Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;100(8):1434-41.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.168831. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Obesity prevention and diabetes screening at local health departments

Xinzhi Zhang  1 , Huabin Luo, Edward W Gregg, Qaiser Mukhtar, Mark Rivera, Lawrence Barker, Ann Albright
Affiliations

Obesity prevention and diabetes screening at local health departments

Xinzhi Zhang et al. Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed whether local health departments (LHDs) were conducting obesity prevention programs and diabetes screening programs, and we examined associations between LHD characteristics and whether they conducted these programs.

Methods: We used the 2005 National Profile of Local Health Departments to conduct a cross-sectional analysis of 2300 LHDs nationwide. We used multivariate logistic regressions to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Approximately 56% of LHDs had obesity prevention programs, 51% had diabetes screening programs, and 34% had both. After controlling for other factors, we found that employing health educators was significantly associated with LHDs conducting obesity prevention programs (OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.54, 2.81) and diabetes screening programs (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.23, 2.17). We also found that conducting chronic disease surveillance was significantly associated with LHDs conducting obesity prevention programs (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.26, 2.20) and diabetes screening programs (OR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.90, 3.15). LHDs with a higher burden of diabetes prevalence were more likely to conduct diabetes screening programs (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.31) but not obesity prevention programs.

Conclusions: The presence of obesity prevention and diabetes screening programs was significantly associated with LHD structural capacity and general performance. However, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of both types of programs remain unknown.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Proportion of local health departments, by state, with (a) obesity prevention programs, (b) diabetes screening programs, and (c) both obesity prevention and diabetes screening programs: United States, National Profile of Local Health Departments, 2005.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288(14):1723–1727 - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006;295(13):1549–1555 - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM. Obesity Among Adults in the United States—No Change Since 2003–2004 Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007. NCHS Data Brief 1
    1. Miniño AM, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kochankek KD. Deaths: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;55(19). - PubMed
    1. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in US adults. The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Diabetes Care 1998;21(4):518–524 - PubMed

MeSH terms