Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory
- PMID: 20560769
- DOI: 10.3109/15368371003685363
Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory
Abstract
An experiment has been made exposing eggs and tadpoles of the common frog (Rana temporaria) to electromagnetic radiation from several mobile (cell) phone antennae located at a distance of 140 meters. The experiment lasted two months, from the egg phase until an advanced phase of tadpole prior to metamorphosis. Measurements of electric field intensity (radiofrequencies and microwaves) in V/m obtained with three different devices were 1.8 to 3.5 V/m. In the exposed group (n = 70), low coordination of movements, an asynchronous growth, resulting in both big and small tadpoles, and a high mortality (90%) was observed. Regarding the control group (n = 70) under the same conditions but inside a Faraday cage, the coordination of movements was normal, the development was synchronous, and a mortality of 4.2% was obtained. These results indicate that radiation emitted by phone masts in a real situation may affect the development and may cause an increase in mortality of exposed tadpoles. This research may have huge implications for the natural world, which is now exposed to high microwave radiation levels from a multitude of phone masts.
Similar articles
-
Waterborne amitrole affects the predator-prey relationship between common frog tadpoles (Rana temporaria) and larval spotted salamander (Salamandra salamandra).Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Aug;53(2):233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00244-006-0229-6. Epub 2007 Jun 1. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007. PMID: 17549540
-
Assessment of radiofrequency/microwave radiation emitted by the antennas of rooftop-mounted mobile phone base stations.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;121(2):122-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci373. Epub 2005 Dec 15. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 16357026
-
Effects of exposing chicken eggs to a cell phone in "call" position over the entire incubation period.Theriogenology. 2008 Apr 1;69(6):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 5. Theriogenology. 2008. PMID: 18255134
-
Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Oct;210(5):635-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Aug 31. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007. PMID: 17765660 Review.
-
Mobile phone radiation and the risk of cancer; a review.Afr J Med Med Sci. 2008 Jun;37(2):107-18. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2008. PMID: 18939393 Review.
Cited by
-
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.Environ Health. 2022 Oct 18;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9. Environ Health. 2022. PMID: 36253855 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Base Transceiver Station (BTS) waves on some blood factors in domestic pigeons: an experimental study.J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2021 Oct 18;19(2):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00738-2. eCollection 2021 Dec. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2021. PMID: 34900310 Free PMC article.
-
Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).Int J Oncol. 2021 Nov;59(5):92. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5272. Epub 2021 Oct 7. Int J Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34617575 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biological Entanglement-Like Effect After Communication of Fish Prior to X-Ray Exposure.Dose Response. 2018 Feb 15;16(1):1559325817750067. doi: 10.1177/1559325817750067. eCollection 2018 Jan-Mar. Dose Response. 2018. PMID: 29479295 Free PMC article.
-
Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:607053. doi: 10.1155/2015/607053. Epub 2015 Aug 5. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26346766 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical