"Good job, you're so smart": The effects of inconsistency of praise type on young children's motivation

J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Oct;107(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that generic praise ("good drawer") is related to children giving up after failure because failure implies the lack of a critical trait (e.g., drawing ability). Conversely, nongeneric praise ("good job drawing") is related to mastery motivation because it implies that success is related to effort. Yet children may receive a mixture of these praise types (i.e., inconsistent praise), the effects of which are unclear. We tested how inconsistent praise influenced two components of motivation: self-evaluation and persistence. Kindergarteners (N=135) were randomly assigned to one of five conditions in which consistency of praise type was varied. After two failure scenarios, children reported self-evaluations and persistence. Results indicated that more nongeneric praise related linearly to greater motivation, yet self-evaluation and persistence were impacted differently by inconsistent praise types. Hearing even a small amount of generic praise reduced persistence, whereas hearing a small amount of nongeneric praise preserved self-evaluation.

MeSH terms

  • Achievement*
  • Child
  • Child Behavior / physiology*
  • Child Behavior / psychology
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motivation / physiology*
  • Reinforcement, Psychology*
  • Self Concept
  • Task Performance and Analysis*