Age-stratified outcomes in elderly patients undergoing open and endovascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease
- PMID: 20580044
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.008
Age-stratified outcomes in elderly patients undergoing open and endovascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease
Abstract
Background: The elderly comprise a sizeable segment of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We analyzed outcomes in elderly patients who underwent open and endovascular procedures for AIOD.
Methods: Elderly patients with AIOD who underwent open and endovascular procedures in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database from 2004 to 2007 were identified. Patients were stratified into age groups: 65-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80 years or older. The clinical outcomes were complications and mortality; the economic outcomes were duration of stay and hospital cost. Both open and endovascular procedures were compared using chi(2) analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multivariate linear and logistic regression.
Results: Patients aged 80 years or older were more likely be nonelective admissions (43%), have a high Charlson Comorbidity Index (12%), and have iliac artery disease (63%, all P < .05). Patients aged 80 years or older who underwent open procedures had higher complication and mortality rates compared with younger patients (both P < .05). Endovascular procedures had a lower complication rate, duration of stay, and hospital cost for all age groups (P < .05). Mortality was significantly lower for endovascular treatment in patients aged 70 years or older (P < .05). A multivariate analysis showed patients aged 70 years or older were at increased risk of complications (P < .05).
Conclusion: For both procedures, clinical outcomes worsen as patient age increases. In patients aged 70 years or older, endovascular treatment conferred a lower complication rate than open repair.
Copyright 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Endovascular procedures for aorto-iliac occlusive disease are associated with superior short-term clinical and economic outcomes compared with open surgery in the inpatient population.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1173-9, 1179.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.100. Epub 2010 Aug 5. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20691560
-
Effect of physician and hospital experience on patient outcomes for endovascular treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease.Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;146(8):966-71. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.187. Arch Surg. 2011. PMID: 21844438
-
Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 Jan 10. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19136232
-
Review of direct anatomical open surgical management of atherosclerotic aorto-iliac occlusive disease.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):460-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.014. Epub 2010 Mar 20. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20303805 Review.
-
Clinical outcomes of 5358 patients undergoing direct open bypass or endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Endovasc Ther. 2013 Aug;20(4):443-55. doi: 10.1583/13-4242.1. J Endovasc Ther. 2013. PMID: 23914850 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between Kissing Stents and Direct Surgical Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.J Chest Surg. 2023 Jul 5;56(4):264-271. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.012. Epub 2023 Apr 25. J Chest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37096251 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: Medical versus Endovascular versus Surgical Therapy.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2011 Apr;13(2):114-28. doi: 10.1007/s11936-011-0117-x. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2011. PMID: 21327584
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
