The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data
- PMID: 20595309
- PMCID: PMC2995657
- DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000505
The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data
Abstract
Objective: Advances in healthcare information technology have provided opportunities to present data in new, more effective ways. In this study, we designed a laboratory display that features small, data-dense graphics called sparklines, which have recently been promoted as effective representations of medical data but have not been well studied. The effect of this novel display on physicians' interpretation of data was investigated.
Design: Twelve physicians talked aloud as they assessed laboratory data from four patients in a pediatric intensive care unit with the graph display and with a conventional table display.
Measurements: Verbalizations were coded based on the abnormal values and trends identified for each lab variable. The correspondence of interpretations of variables in each display was evaluated, and patterns were investigated across participants. Assessment time was also analyzed.
Results: Physicians completed assessments significantly faster with the graphical display (3.6 min vs 4.4 min, p=0.042). When compared across displays, 37% of interpretations did not match. Graphs were more useful when the visual cues in tables did not provide trend information, while slightly abnormal values were easier to identify with tables.
Conclusions: Data presentation format can affect how physicians interpret laboratory data. Graphic displays have several advantages over numeric displays but are not always optimal. User, task and data characteristics should be considered when designing information displays.
Figures
Similar articles
-
World-Wide Web-based graphical user interfaces for laboratory data.Methods Inf Med. 2002;41(5):411-3. Methods Inf Med. 2002. PMID: 12501813
-
Information structure and the relative efficacy of tables and graphs.Hum Factors. 1999 Dec;41(4):570-87. doi: 10.1518/001872099779656707. Hum Factors. 1999. PMID: 10774128 Clinical Trial.
-
Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):520-528. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw169. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28040686 Free PMC article.
-
Graphical tactile displays for visually-impaired people.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Mar;15(1):119-30. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.891375. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007. PMID: 17436884 Review.
-
Effective graphical displays.Pharm Dev Technol. 2001 Aug;6(3):477-84. doi: 10.1081/pdt-100002613. Pharm Dev Technol. 2001. PMID: 11485189 Review.
Cited by
-
Centralized Multipatient Dashboards' Impact on Intensive Care Unit Clinician Performance and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review.Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):414-427. doi: 10.1055/a-2299-7643. Epub 2024 Apr 4. Appl Clin Inform. 2024. PMID: 38574763
-
HistoriView: Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Review a Patient Using a Scalable Space-Efficient Timeline without Zoom Interactions.Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):250-264. doi: 10.1055/a-2269-0995. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Appl Clin Inform. 2024. PMID: 38359876
-
Patient Information Summarization in Clinical Settings: Scoping Review.JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Nov 28;11:e44639. doi: 10.2196/44639. JMIR Med Inform. 2023. PMID: 38015588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Triptychon: Usability evaluation and implementation of a web-based application for patients' lab and vital parameters.Digit Health. 2023 Nov 5;9:20552076231211552. doi: 10.1177/20552076231211552. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37936956 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Influencing Clinicians' Use of Hospital Information Systems for Infection Prevention and Control: Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Extended DeLone and McLean Model.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 22;25:e44900. doi: 10.2196/44900. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37347523 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bates DW, Gawande AA. Patient safety: improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526–34 - PubMed
-
- Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes—a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223–38 - PubMed
-
- Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1409–16 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
