Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 27 (1), 37-46, 75

[Preserving the Natural Tooth Versus Extraction and Implant Placement: Making a Rational Clinical Decision]

[Article in Hebrew]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 20597259
Review

[Preserving the Natural Tooth Versus Extraction and Implant Placement: Making a Rational Clinical Decision]

[Article in Hebrew]
I Tsesis et al. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993).

Abstract

Modern dental practice offers a wide variety of treatment alternatives and modalities. With the wider scale of treatment options, new dilemmas emerged. A common dilemma is the decision whether to preserve the natural tooth by endodontic treatment, or to extract the tooth and replace it with a single dental implant. The clinician needs to remember that the basic goal of dental implants is to replace missing teeth, and not present teeth. Prosthodontic, periodontal, and esthetic considerations should be integrated in the treatment planning process. Long-term prognosis, the capabilities offered by the modern endodontic treatment, the alternatives in case of treatment failure, post treatment quality of life and patient's preferences should all be recognized and incorporated in the dentist decision making. An important factor is the communication between the prosthodontist and the endodontist before and during the treatment in order to avoid possible risks or treatment failure. The integration of these factors would assist the clinician to achieve a rational treatment plan for the benefit of the patient.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Substances

Feedback