Limitations of ultrasonography in surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms

Br J Surg. 1991 May;78(5):614-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780529.

Abstract

The repeatability, observer bias and instrument bias of aortic diameter measurement by ultrasonography, were investigated in ten patients with small (3-6 cm by computed tomography) infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The repeatability of maximum aortic diameter measurement by ultrasonography was much better for anterior-posterior than transverse diameter, with coefficients of repeatability 3.0-7.5 mm and 10-15 mm respectively. The repeatability of suprarenal aortic diameter measurement was poor. Surprisingly, maximum diameter using ultrasonography was larger than that using computed tomography, the difference being least for anterior-posterior measurements. At best a single, experienced observer, using the same instrument may provide aortic diameters using ultrasonography accurate to within 5 mm, but more commonly such aortic diameter is only accurate to within 8 mm.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aorta, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging
  • Aorta, Abdominal / pathology
  • Aortic Aneurysm / diagnostic imaging*
  • Aortic Aneurysm / pathology
  • Humans
  • Observer Variation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography