Accounting for variation in technical quality and patient satisfaction: the contribution of patient, provider, team, and medical center
- PMID: 20613661
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e35b1f
Accounting for variation in technical quality and patient satisfaction: the contribution of patient, provider, team, and medical center
Abstract
Background: The delivery of healthcare depends on individual providers, coordination within teams, and the structure of the work setting. We analyzed the amount of variation in technical quality and patient satisfaction accounted for at the patient, provider, team, and medical center level.
Methods: Data abstracted from Veterans Health Administration patient medical records for 2007 were used to calculate measures of technical quality based on adherence to best practice guidelines in 5 domains. Outpatient satisfaction was obtained from a 2007 standardized national mail survey. Hierarchical linear models that accounted for the clustering of patients within providers, providers within teams, and teams within medical centers were used to partition the variation in technical quality and satisfaction across patients and components of the system (ie, providers, teams, and medical centers).
Results: Providers accounted for the largest percent of system-level variance for all technical quality domains, ranging from 46.5% to 71.9%. For the single-item measure of patient satisfaction, medical centers, teams, and providers accounted for about the same percent of system-level variance (31%-34%). For the doctor/patient interaction scale providers explained 59.9% of system-level variance, more than double that of teams and medical centers. For all the measures, the residual variance (composed of patient-level and random error) explained the largest proportion of the total variance.
Conclusions: Providers explained the greatest amount of system-level variation in technical quality and patient satisfaction. However, in both of these domains, differences between patients were the predominant source of nonrandom variance.
Similar articles
-
Facility-level factors influencing chronic heart failure care process performance in a national integrated health delivery system.Med Care. 2007 Jan;45(1):28-45. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000244531.69528.ee. Med Care. 2007. PMID: 17279019
-
How mental health providers spend their time: a survey of 10 Veterans Health Administration mental health services.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003 Jun;6(2):89-97. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2003. PMID: 14578541
-
Provider feedback improves adherence with AHCPR Smoking Cessation Guideline.Prev Med. 2001 Nov;33(5):415-21. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0907. Prev Med. 2001. PMID: 11676582
-
Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality?Med Care. 2010 Feb;48(2):133-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c15a6e. Med Care. 2010. PMID: 20057330
-
Continuity of care and other determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care.J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40135.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15836525 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Contribution of Patient, Primary Care Physician, and Primary Care Clinic Factors to Good Bone Health Care.Perm J. 2021 Jan;25:1-3. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.095. Perm J. 2021. PMID: 33635767 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Measures Evaluating Patient Satisfaction in Integrated Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Community Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;57(8):1464-1477. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00760-y. Epub 2021 Jan 5. Community Ment Health J. 2021. PMID: 33400047
-
Barriers to providing maternity care to women with physical disabilities: Perspectives from health care practitioners.Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):445-450. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 3. Disabil Health J. 2017. PMID: 28089188 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
