Contamination during 4 years of annual CT screening in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST)
- PMID: 20619924
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.06.006
Contamination during 4 years of annual CT screening in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST)
Abstract
Introduction: Contamination, defined as screening in the control arm, may dilute the statistical power of randomised screening trials. We investigated the rate of contamination in DLCST during 4 years of annual CT screening.
Methods: DLCST is a randomised trial involving 4104 healthy current and ex smokers. 2052 subjects were randomised to annual low dose chest CT scans (CT group) and 2052 were given no intervention (control group). The study is performed in collaboration with the NELSON trial (Nederlands Leuvens Screening Onderzoek) and mortality data will be pooled at the end. We defined contamination as off study CT scan received for lung cancer screening purposes. Annually during the screening period, the participants were asked whether they had received a CT scan and if so the purpose. The causes were divided into the following categories: 'Off study screening for lung cancer', 'Investigation of lung symptoms', 'Investigation of incidental finding on chest radiograph', 'Participation in other scientific trial involving chest CT', and finally 'Chest CT for other reasons'.
Results: Response rates were high in both groups: 86.1% (control group), 93.6% (CT group) p<0.001.
Control group: 199 out of 7065 answers (2.8%) indicating acquisition of a chest CT during 4 years of the trial. Three answers fulfilled the definition of contamination, while 8 received chest CT due to involvement in other scientific trials. 126 reported CT scans as part of investigation for other diseases, while 10 and 52 went through investigations for abnormal chest radiograph and lung symptoms, respectively. CT group: Significantly lower number of answers (n=134) indicated acquisition of an off study chest CT. None had received off study lung cancer screening. Three were involved in other scientific trials, while 17 and 115 went through investigation of lung symptoms and chest CT for other reasons, respectively.
Conclusion: Although the frequency of off study chest CT was significantly higher in the control group, it was relatively small in both randomisation groups, and thus contamination seems to be modest and acceptable in the DLCST. Clinical Trial no.: Clinical Trials.gov Protocol Registration System (identification no. NCT00496977).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Direct and indirect healthcare costs of lung cancer CT screening in Denmark: a registry study.BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e031768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031768. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 31969362 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3):B5027. Dan Med J. 2015. PMID: 25748876 Clinical Trial.
-
Psychosocial consequences in the Danish randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial (DLCST).Lung Cancer. 2015 Jan;87(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Lung Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25433982 Clinical Trial.
-
Smoking habits in the randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with low-dose CT: final results after a 5-year screening programme.Thorax. 2014 Jun;69(6):574-9. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203849. Epub 2014 Jan 17. Thorax. 2014. PMID: 24443174 Clinical Trial.
-
Healthcare costs in the Danish randomised controlled lung cancer CT-screening trial: a registry study.Lung Cancer. 2014 Mar;83(3):347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 30. Lung Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24418526 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35921047 Review.
-
Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 4;10(6):e034682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034682. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32503869 Free PMC article.
-
Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trials.Breathe (Sheff). 2020 Mar;16(1):200013. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0013-2020. Breathe (Sheff). 2020. PMID: 32194774 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct and indirect healthcare costs of lung cancer CT screening in Denmark: a registry study.BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e031768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031768. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 31969362 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e78S-e92S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2350. Chest. 2013. PMID: 23649455 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
