Routine opt-out rapid HIV screening and detection of HIV infection in emergency department patients
- PMID: 20639562
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.953
Routine opt-out rapid HIV screening and detection of HIV infection in emergency department patients
Abstract
Context: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine (nontargeted) opt-out HIV screening in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs), where the prevalence of undiagnosed infection is 0.1% or greater. The utility of this approach in EDs remains unknown.
Objective: To determine whether nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the ED was associated with identification of more patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection than physician-directed diagnostic rapid HIV testing.
Design, setting, and patients: Quasi-experimental equivalent time-samples design in an urban public safety-net hospital with an approximate annual ED census of 55,000 patient visits. Patients were 16 years or older and capable of providing consent for rapid HIV testing.
Interventions: Nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening and physician-directed diagnostic rapid HIV testing alternated in sequential 4-month time intervals between April 15, 2007, and April 15, 2009.
Main outcome measures: Number of patients with newly identified HIV infection and the association between nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening and identification of HIV infection.
Results: In the opt-out phase, of 28,043 eligible ED patients, 6933 patients (25%) completed HIV testing (6702 patients were screened; 231 patients were diagnostically tested). Ten of 6702 patients (0.15%; 95% CI, 0.07%-0.27%) who did not decline HIV screening in the opt-out phase had new HIV diagnoses, and 5 of 231 patients (2.2%; 95% CI, 0.7%-5.0%) who were diagnostically tested during the opt-out phase had new HIV diagnoses. In the diagnostic phase, of 29,925 eligible patients, 243 (0.8%) completed HIV testing. Of these, 4 patients (1.6%; 95% CI, 0.5%-4.2%) had new diagnoses. The prevalence of new HIV diagnoses in the opt-out phase (including those diagnostically tested) and in the diagnostic phase was 15 in 28,043 (0.05%; 95% CI, 0.03%-0.09%) and 4 in 29,925 (0.01%; 95% CI, 0.004%-0.03%), respectively. Nontargeted opt-out HIV screening was independently associated with new HIV diagnoses (risk ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2-10.8) when adjusting for patient demographics, insurance status, and whether diagnostic testing was performed in the opt-out phase. The median CD4 cell count for those with new HIV diagnoses in the opt-out phase (including those diagnostically tested) and in the diagnostic phase was 69/microL (IQR, 17-430) and 13/microL (IQR, 11-15) , respectively (P = .02).
Conclusion: Nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the ED, vs diagnostic testing, was associated with identification of a modestly increased number of patients with new HIV diagnoses, most of whom were identified late in the course of disease.
Comment in
-
HIV screening in health care settings: some progress, even more questions.JAMA. 2010 Jul 21;304(3):348-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.996. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20639572 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing practices in an urban emergency department: assessment of the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV screening in health care settings.Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;51(3):303-9, 309.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.028. Epub 2008 Jan 11. Ann Emerg Med. 2008. PMID: 18191295
-
Programmatic cost evaluation of nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the emergency department.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e81565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081565. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24391706 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of opt-out inpatient HIV screening at an urban teaching hospital.AIDS Care. 2017 Aug;29(8):1014-1018. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1282106. Epub 2017 Jan 23. AIDS Care. 2017. PMID: 28114789 Free PMC article.
-
Opt-out screening strategy for HIV infection among patients attending emergency departments: systematic review and meta-analysis.HIV Med. 2017 Jul;18(6):419-429. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12474. Epub 2016 Dec 21. HIV Med. 2017. PMID: 28000338 Review.
-
The Role of Targeted HIV Screening in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Curr HIV Res. 2021;19(2):106-120. doi: 10.2174/1570162X18666201123113905. Curr HIV Res. 2021. PMID: 33231157 Review.
Cited by
-
Modeling the transmission mitigation impact of testing for infectious diseases.Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 14;10(24):eadk5108. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk5108. Epub 2024 Jun 14. Sci Adv. 2024. PMID: 38875334 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: Results From the Pragmatic Randomized HIV Testing Using Enhanced Screening Techniques in Emergency Departments Trial.Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Ann Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38661620 Clinical Trial.
-
A Systematic Review of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Implementation in U.S. Emergency Departments: Patient Screening, Prescribing, and Linkage to Care.J Community Health. 2024 Jun;49(3):499-513. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01320-7. Epub 2023 Dec 21. J Community Health. 2024. PMID: 38127296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
HIV testing: the cornerstone of HIV prevention efforts in the USA.Future Virol. 2011 Nov;6(11):10.2217/fvl.11.114. doi: 10.2217/fvl.11.114. Future Virol. 2011. PMID: 37965646 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of US emergency departments by HIV priority jurisdiction designation: A case for geographically targeted screening in teaching hospitals.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0292869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292869. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37851641 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
