Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States
- PMID: 20654773
- DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.002
Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States
Abstract
A review of the literature and analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database was performed to describe the trends in vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States and the factors associated with changing use. Vaginal birth after cesarean increased after the first National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference on Cesarean Childbirth in 1981. It increased from 3% to a maximum rate of 28.3% in 1996. Despite studies reporting stable success rates of approximately 70% and low complication rates (<1%), concerns about patient safety and physician liability have led to more restrictive policies and a decrease in vaginal birth after cesarean use. The current rate is approximately 8.5%, and decreased rates have been noted for all age and ethnic groups. There is decreased use of vaginal birth after cesarean as the result of concerns about patient safety and physician liability, which has resulted in decreased availability.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010.Semin Perinatol. 2010 Oct;34(5):351-65. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.06.002. Semin Perinatol. 2010. PMID: 20869552 No abstract available.
-
Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.CMAJ. 1993 Apr 15;148(8):1315-20. CMAJ. 1993. PMID: 8462053 Free PMC article.
-
Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States.Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007. Clin Perinatol. 2011. PMID: 21645788
-
Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.Clin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;35(2):293-307, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.007. Clin Perinatol. 2008. PMID: 18456070 Review.
-
Vaginal birth after cesarean section: an update on physician trends and patient perceptions.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;6(5):417-25. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 7827271 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 16;103(7):e37156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037156. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38363952 Free PMC article.
-
Trial of labor after previous single cesarean delivery in grand-multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;304(2):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05946-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33389110
-
Effect of a Patient-Centered Decision Support Tool on Rates of Trial of Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery: The PROCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2151-2159. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5952. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32484533 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Reasons for previous Cesarean deliveries impact a woman's independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2833-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32204702 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital bans on trial of labor after cesarean and antepartum transfer of care.Birth. 2019 Dec;46(4):574-582. doi: 10.1111/birt.12460. Epub 2019 Nov 5. Birth. 2019. PMID: 31691369 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
