Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 5 (9), 660-5

Bioorthogonal Chemistry Amplifies Nanoparticle Binding and Enhances the Sensitivity of Cell Detection

Affiliations

Bioorthogonal Chemistry Amplifies Nanoparticle Binding and Enhances the Sensitivity of Cell Detection

Jered B Haun et al. Nat Nanotechnol.

Abstract

Nanoparticles have emerged as key materials for biomedical applications because of their unique and tunable physical properties, multivalent targeting capability, and high cargo capacity. Motivated by these properties and by current clinical needs, numerous diagnostic and therapeutic nanomaterials have recently emerged. Here we describe a novel nanoparticle targeting platform that uses a rapid, catalyst-free cycloaddition as the coupling mechanism. Antibodies against biomarkers of interest were modified with trans-cyclooctene and used as scaffolds to couple tetrazine-modified nanoparticles onto live cells. We show that the technique is fast, chemoselective, adaptable to metal nanomaterials, and scalable for biomedical use. This method also supports amplification of biomarker signals, making it superior to alternative targeting techniques including avidin/biotin.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of BOND
a, Schematic showing the conjugation chemistry between antibody and nanoparticle. The diagram is a schematic and not to scale. b, Comparative sizes (to scale) of a representative mouse IgG2a antibody (lysine residues available for TCO modification via amine-reactive chemistry are shown in yellow), a TCO modification and an avidin protein for comparison. Tetrazine is similar in size to TCO (~200 Da). Protein structures and sizes were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (antibody, 1IGT; avidin, 3FDC) c, Application of BOND for one-step (direct) and two-step targeting of nanoparticles to cells. Note that the antibody and tetrazine are present in multiple copies per nanoparticle (~2–3 antibodies, Ab; 84 tetrazine, Tz).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of TCO loading on nanoparticle binding using BOND-2
a, Fluorescence intensity measurements on live cells following sequential incubations with 10 μg ml−1 TCO-modified antibody and 10 nM Tz–MFNP using flow cytometry. Trastuzumab (anti-HER2), cetuximab (anti-EGFR) and anti-EpCAM antibodies were loaded with different numbers of TCO and measured by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Supplementary Figs S1, S2). MFNP targeted HER2 on SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells, EpCAM on HCT 116 colon cancer cells, and EGFR on A549 lung cancer cells. b, Confocal microscopy images of similarly labelled live cells. Control: non-binding, TCO-modified control antibody (clone MOPC-21). HER2 (i,ii); EpCAM (iii,iv); EGFR (v, vi). Scale bar, 50 μm (i).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of different nanoparticle targeting strategies
SK-BR-3, HCT 116 and A549 cells were labelled with different concentrations of MFNP using the two-step BOND-2 or direct MFNP immuno-conjugates, and the fluorescence signal was measured using flow cytometry. MFNP immuno-conjugates were prepared either via maleimide/thiol or TCO/Tz (BOND-1) chemistries. Control samples were incubated with Tz–MFNP only. BOND-2 resulted in significantly higher nanoparticle binding, exceeding the direct immuno-conjugates by a factor of 15 for HER2. b, Fluorescence intensity of SK-BR-3 and HCT 116 cells labelled with 10 μg ml−1 biotin-modified antibody and 100 nM avidin–MFNP was measured using flow cytometry. Biotinylated anti-HER2 and anti-EpCAM antibodies were prepared analogously to the TCO modifications, and biotin levels were determined by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Supplementary Figs S1, S2). Nanoparticle binding increased with biotin loading but remained lower than BOND-2 in both cases. Values for BOND-1 and BOND-2 were taken from a (100 nM MFNP).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Profiling cancer cells using diagnostic magnetic resonance
Magnetic profiling of cell samples (human tumour cell lines: A431, A549, NCI-H1650, HCT 116, SK-BR-3 and SK-OV-3; control: NIH/3T3 fibroblasts, peripheral blood leukocytes) for a panel of cancer markers in scant samples (~1,000 cells) using a recently developed miniaturized diagnostic magnetic resonance device. Cells were labelled with TCO–antibodies followed by Tz–MFNP before measurement of transverse relaxation time (R2). a, Marker expression levels, determined based on the ratio of the positive marker ( ΔR2+) and control ( ΔR2θ) signals (see Supplementary Methods), were heterogeneous for tumour cells but normal for the control fibroblasts and leukocytes, with the exception of the leukocyte marker CD45. b, The tumour signals showed excellent correlation with measured marker expression levels, as determined independently by flow cytometry (values listed in Supplementary Table S1).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 96 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback