How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community
- PMID: 20702437
- PMCID: PMC2982946
- DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032565
How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community
Abstract
Objective: To describe the level of obligation conveyed by deontic terms (words such as "should", "may", "must" and "is indicated") commonly found in clinical practice guidelines.
Design: Cross-sectional electronic survey.
Setting: A clinical scenario was developed by the researchers, and recommendations containing 12 deontic terms and phrases were presented to the participants.
Participants: All 1332 registrants of the 2008 annual conference of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Main outcome measures: Participants indicated the level of obligation they believed guideline authors intended by using a slider mechanism ranging from "No obligation" (leftmost position recorded as 0) to "Full obligation" (rightmost position recorded as 100.)
Results: 445/1332 registrants (36%) submitted the on-line survey; 254/445 (57%) reported that they have experience in developing clinical practice guidelines; 133/445 (30%) indicated that they provide healthcare. "Must" conveyed the highest level of obligation (median = 100) and least amount of variability (interquartile range = 5.) "May" (median = 37) and "may consider" (median = 33) conveyed the lowest levels of obligation. All other terms conveyed intermediate levels of obligation characterised by wide and overlapping interquartile ranges.
Conclusions: Members of the health services community believe guideline authors intend variable levels of obligation when using different deontic terms within practice recommendations. Ranking of a subset of terms by intended level of obligation is possible. Matching deontic terminology to the intended recommendation strength can help standardise the use of deontic terminology by guideline developers.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Study of perceptions of the extent to which guideline recommendations are binding: a survey of commonly used terminology.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Oct;110(40):663-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0663. Epub 2013 Oct 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013. PMID: 24167523 Free PMC article.
-
[Obligation of guideline recommendations: Perception survey among guideline developers].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;113:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016. PMID: 27480183 German.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):282-92. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-064ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256172 Review.
-
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 30033227 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Validation, visibility, vagueness and variation: A qualitative assessment of existing veterinary guidelines for antimicrobial use in cattle and sheep in the UK.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294733. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38032877 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical practice guideline recommendation summaries for pediatric oncology health care professionals: A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0281890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281890. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36809380 Free PMC article.
-
A user-friendly clinical practice guideline summary for managing low back pain in South Africa.S Afr J Physiother. 2020 Feb 20;76(1):1366. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v76i1.1366. eCollection 2020. S Afr J Physiother. 2020. PMID: 32161826 Free PMC article.
-
More Guidelines than states: variations in U.S. lead screening and management guidance and impacts on shareable CDS development.BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8225-8. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31996264 Free PMC article.
-
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30771069 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources