Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms
- PMID: 20706161
- PMCID: PMC3079487
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e57918
Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms
Abstract
Objective: We sought to estimate the direct cost, from the perspective of the health insurer or purchaser, of breast-care services in the year following a false positive screening mammogram compared with a true negative examination.
Design: We identified 21,125 women aged 40 to 80 years enrolled in an integrated healthcare delivery system in Washington State, who participated in screening mammography between January 1, 1998 and July 30, 2002. Pathology and cancer registry data were used to identify breast cancer diagnoses in the year following the screening mammogram. A positive examination was defined as a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessment of 0, 4, or 5. Women with a positive screening mammogram but no breast cancer diagnosed within 1 year were classified as false positives. We used diagnostic and procedure codes in automated health plan data to identify services received in the year following the screening mammogram. Medicare reimbursement rates were applied to all services. We used ordinary least-squares linear regression to estimate the difference in costs following a false positive versus true negative screening mammogram.
Results: False positive results occurred in 9.9% of women; most false positives (87.3%) were followed by breast imaging only. The mean cost of breast-care following a false positive mammogram was $527. This was $503 (95% confidence interval, $490-$515) more than the cost of breast-care services for true negative women.
Conclusions: The direct costs for breast-related procedures following false positive screening mammograms may contribute substantially to US healthcare spending.
Similar articles
-
Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jul 6;131(1):1-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-1-199907060-00002. Ann Intern Med. 1999. PMID: 10391809 Clinical Trial.
-
National expenditure for false-positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnoses estimated at $4 billion a year.Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):576-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1087. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015. PMID: 25847639
-
Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1089-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9545356
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19920273 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Contrast-enhanced mammography versus conventional imaging in women recalled from breast cancer screening (RACER trial): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial.Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jul 3;44:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100987. eCollection 2024 Sep. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024. PMID: 39049869 Free PMC article.
-
A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 May;6(3):e230033. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230033. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024. PMID: 38597785 Free PMC article.
-
Early signs of cancer present in the fine detail of mammograms.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0282872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282872. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37018164 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating age, BMI, and serum N-glycans detected by MALDI mass spectrometry to classify suspicious mammogram findings as benign lesions or breast cancer.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 2;12(1):20801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25401-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36460712 Free PMC article.
-
Electroporation-based proteome sampling ex vivo enables the detection of brain melanoma protein signatures in a location proximate to visible tumor margins.PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0265866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265866. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35588133 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BKS, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347–360. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, et al. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:516–526. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–726. - PubMed
-
- DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB. US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening. JAMA. 2010;303:172–173. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
