Code status discussions at hospital admission are not associated with patient and surrogate satisfaction with hospital care: results from the multicenter hospitalist study
- PMID: 20713421
- DOI: 10.1177/1049909110374352
Code status discussions at hospital admission are not associated with patient and surrogate satisfaction with hospital care: results from the multicenter hospitalist study
Abstract
Background: Physicians may avoid code status discussions for fear of decreasing patient or surrogate satisfaction.
Methods: Charts of patients admitted to medical services at 6 university hospitals were reviewed for documentation of a code status discussion in the first 24 hours of admission. Satisfaction with care provided during the hospitalization was assessed by telephone 1 month after discharge.
Results: Of the 11 717 patients with 1-month follow-up, 1090 (9.3%) had a code status discussion documented. Patient or surrogate satisfaction did not differ by whether a discussion was documented. The lack of association persisted after adjusting for patient's severity of illness and using propensity adjustment for likelihood of having a discussion.
Conclusions: Discussing code status on admission to the inpatient setting did not affect patient or surrogate satisfaction.
Similar articles
-
End-of-life care in a voluntary hospitalist model: effects on communication, processes of care, and patient symptoms.Am J Med. 2004 May 15;116(10):669-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.027. Am J Med. 2004. PMID: 15121493
-
Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience.Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2299-308. Arch Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 7944852
-
Patient satisfaction with hospital care provided by hospitalists and primary care physicians.J Hosp Med. 2012 Feb;7(2):131-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.973. Epub 2011 Oct 31. J Hosp Med. 2012. PMID: 22042532
-
Code status discussions between attending hospitalist physicians and medical patients at hospital admission.J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1568-6. Epub 2010 Nov 20. J Gen Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21104036 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a comportment and communication tool for use in hospital medicine.J Hosp Med. 2016 Dec;11(12):853-858. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2647. Epub 2016 Aug 13. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 27520481 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting neurological outcome in adult patients with cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance.Crit Care. 2022 Dec 11;26(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04263-y. Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 36503620 Free PMC article.
-
Code status documentation at admission in COVID-19 patients: a descriptive cohort study.BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 10;11(11):e050268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050268. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34758991 Free PMC article.
-
Processes of code status transitions in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123(24):4895-4902. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30969. Epub 2017 Sep 7. Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28881383 Free PMC article.
-
Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients.J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014 Apr 14;4(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745. eCollection 2014. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014. PMID: 24765258 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of code status documentation and end-of-life outcomes in patients admitted to an oncology ward.Support Care Cancer. 2014 Feb;22(2):375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1983-4. Support Care Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24077686
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
