Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm

Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):559-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01115.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Abstract

We examined whether the cue-locked centroparietal positivity is associated with switch-specific or general preparation processes. If this positivity (300-400 ms) indexes switch-specific preparation, faster switch trials associated with smaller RT switch cost should have a larger positivity as compared to slower switch trials, but no such association should be evident for repeat trials. We extracted ERP waveforms corresponding to semi-deciles of each participant's RT distribution (i.e., fastest to slowest 5% of trials) for switch and repeat conditions. Consistent with a switch-specific preparation process, centroparietal positivity amplitude was linked to slower RT and larger RT switch cost for switch but not repeat trials. A later pre-target negativity (500-600 ms) was inversely correlated with RT for both switch and repeat trials, consistent with a general anticipatory preparation processes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cues
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Electroencephalography
  • Evoked Potentials / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Parietal Lobe / physiology
  • Psychomotor Performance / physiology*
  • Reaction Time / physiology
  • Young Adult