Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 1):1720-39.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01162.x. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

The effects of cost sharing on access to care among childless adults

Affiliations

The effects of cost sharing on access to care among childless adults

Gery P Guy Jr. Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the impact of public health insurance expansions and the use of enrollee cost sharing on insurance status and receipt of clinically indicated preventive screenings and physician services.

Data source: This study uses Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from 1997 to 2007.

Study design: This study uses multivariate difference-in-difference logistic regression modeling of pooled cross-sectional time series data. The effect of the expansions on insurance status and access to care is identified by cross-state variation in program implementation, as well as cross-state and within-state variation in program eligibility criteria over time.

Principal findings: Childless adult expansions, regardless of cost-sharing levels, reduced uninsurance rates and decreased the likelihood that childless adults needed to see a physician but did not because of cost. Expansions with traditional public insurance cost-sharing requirements increased the use of preventive screenings, while expansions with increased cost-sharing requirements did not.

Conclusions: Cost-sharing requirements did not have an impact on the ability to see a physician when needed, but they played an important role in the utilization of preventive services. Expanding public health insurance to low-income, childless adults presents a promising policy opportunity, but there are trade-offs between the efficiencies obtained through increased cost sharing and the potential inefficiencies due to the lower use of preventive services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams EK, Florence C, Thorpe K, Becker E, Joski P. Preventive Care: Female Cancer Screening, 1996–2000. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;25(4):301–7. - PubMed
    1. Ai C, Norton EC. Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters. 2003;80(1):123–9.
    1. Aizer A. Public Health Insurance, Program Take-Up and Child Health. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2007;89(3):400–15.
    1. Aizer A, Grogger J. Parental Medicaid Expansions and Health Insurance Coverage. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2003.
    1. Andersen R, Aday LA. Access to Medical Care in the U.S.: Realized and Potential. Medical Care. 1978;16(7):533–46. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources