Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease
- PMID: 20820041
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00007
Meta-analysis: Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease
Abstract
Background: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive, radiation-free imaging method for studying peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower extremities.
Purpose: To summarize evidence of prospective studies about how well MRA identifies or excludes arterial steno-occlusions (50% to 100% lumen reduction) in adults with PAD symptoms.
Data sources: PubMed and 3 other databases were searched from 1998 to 2009 without language restrictions.
Study selection: Two independent reviewers selected 32 studies that compared MRA with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in PAD. Eligible studies were prospective and provided data to reconstruct 2 x 2 or 3 x 3 contingency tables (<50% stenosis vs. > or =50% stenosis or occlusion of arterial segments) in at least 10 patients with PAD symptoms.
Data extraction: Two reviewers independently assessed the study quality and extracted the study data, with disagreements resolved by consensus.
Data synthesis: The 32 included studies generally had high methodological quality. About 26% of the 1022 included patients had critical limb ischemia with pain at rest or tissue loss. Overall, the pooled sensitivity of MRA was 94.7% (95% CI, 92.1% to 96.4%) and the specificity was 95.6% (CI, 94.0% to 96.8%) for diagnosing segmental steno-occlusions. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 21.56 (CI, 15.70 to 29.69) and 0.056 (CI, 0.037 to 0.083), respectively. Magnetic resonance angiography correctly classified 95.3%, overstaged 3.1%, and understaged 1.6% of arterial segments.
Limitation: Similar to most studies of computed tomographic angiography in PAD, the primary studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of MRA on a per-segment basis, not a per-patient basis.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis of 32 prospective studies further increases the evidence that contrast-enhanced MRA has high accuracy for identifying or excluding clinically relevant arterial steno-occlusions in adults with PAD symptoms.
Primary funding source: None.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: Contrast-enhanced MRA is highly accurate for diagnosing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 18;154(2):JC1-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-2-201101180-02011. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21242353 No abstract available.
-
Prospective studies show that magnetic resonance angiography has high sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant arterial steno-occlusions in adults with peripheral arterial disease symptoms.Evid Based Med. 2011 Jun;16(3):90-1. doi: 10.1136/ebm1185. Epub 2011 Feb 2. Evid Based Med. 2011. PMID: 21288998 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):543-8; discussion 548. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.045. Epub 2007 Jan 16. J Vasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17223303
-
Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.Invest Radiol. 2008 Sep;43(9):642-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e90ba. Invest Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18708858
-
Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1402-10. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22086. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010. PMID: 20512893 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA. 2009 Jan 28;301(4):415-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.301.4.415. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19176443 Review.
-
Whole-body MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease.Dan Med Bull. 2010 Dec;57(12):B4231. Dan Med Bull. 2010. PMID: 21122468 Review.
Cited by
-
The Ability to Look Beyond: The Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 23;12(9):3073. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093073. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37176513 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Study protocol for a multicentre comparative diagnostic accuracy study of tools to establish the presence and severity of peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes mellitus: the DM PAD study.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 3;12(11):e066950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066950. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36328388 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of bedside tests for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease in patients prone to medial arterial calcification: A systematic review.EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jul 1;50:101532. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101532. eCollection 2022 Aug. EClinicalMedicine. 2022. PMID: 35812995 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval-single-shot magnetic resonance angiography in peripheral arterial disease.Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2393-2403. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08349-z. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34766201
-
Feasibility and Robustness of 3T Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using Modified Dixon Fat Suppression in Patients With Known or Suspected Peripheral Artery Disease.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Oct 30;7:549392. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.549392. eCollection 2020. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020. PMID: 33195449 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources