Increased in-hospital complications after primary posterior versus primary anterior cervical fusion
- PMID: 20838946
- PMCID: PMC3032873
- DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1549-4
Increased in-hospital complications after primary posterior versus primary anterior cervical fusion
Erratum in
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 May;469(5):1502-4
Abstract
Background: Although anterior (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCDF) are relatively common procedures and both are associated with certain complications, the relative frequency and severity of these complications is unclear. Since for some patients either approach might be reasonable it is important to know the relative perioperative risks for decision-making.
Questions/purposes: The purposes of this study were to: (1) characterize the patient population undergoing ACDF and PCDF; (2) compare perioperative complication rates; (3) determine independent risk factors for adverse perioperative events; and (4) aid in surgical decision-making in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between anterior and posterior cervical fusion procedures.
Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was used and entries for ACDF and PCDF between 1998 and 2006 were analyzed. Demographics and complication rates were determined and regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality after ACDF and PCDF.
Results: ACDF had a shorter length of stay and their procedures were more frequently performed at nonteaching institutions. The incidence of complications and mortality was 4.14% and 0.26% among patients undergoing ACDF and 15.35% and 1.44% for patients undergoing PCDF, respectively. When controlling for overall comorbidity burden and other demographic variables, PCDF was associated with a twofold increased risk of a fatal outcome compared with ACDF. Pulmonary, circulatory, and renal disease were associated with the highest odds for in-hospital mortality.
Conclusions: PCDF procedures were associated with higher perioperative rates of complications and mortality compared with ACDF surgeries. Despite limitations, these data should be considered in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between both approaches.
Level of evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Inpatient Complications and Health Care Costs of Anterior versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Patients with Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e112-e119. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.132. Epub 2019 Sep 28. World Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 31574327
-
Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29155340 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 1;39(1):53-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000044. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014. PMID: 24108292
-
Comparison of Cost and Perioperative Outcome Profiles for Primary and Revision Posterior Cervical Fusion Procedures.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Oct 1;46(19):1295-1301. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004019. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 34517398
-
30- and 90-Day Unplanned Readmission Rates, Causes, and Risk Factors After Cervical Fusion: A Single-Institution Analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):762-769. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002937. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 30475339
Cited by
-
Design and Validation of a Novel Robotic Neck Brace for Cervical Traction.IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2024 Aug;29(4):3092-3099. doi: 10.1109/tmech.2024.3402614. Epub 2024 Jun 5. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2024. PMID: 39246648
-
A comparison of in-hospital outcomes after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in cases with and without Parkinson's Disease.N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Aug 31;12:100164. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100164. eCollection 2022 Dec. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022. PMID: 36304443 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of expert-level therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy using ensemble machine learning algorithms.Front Surg. 2022 Sep 6;9:1010420. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010420. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36147698 Free PMC article.
-
A Risk Calculator for the Prediction of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Instrumented Cervical Fusion.World Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;166:e703-e710. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.082. Epub 2022 Jul 22. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35872129 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for deep surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery in adults: a multicentre observational cohort study.Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 6;11(1):7519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87110-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33824381 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Browne JA, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Bethel MA. Richardson WJ (2007) Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1976;32:2214–2219. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
